User talk:Khardy1992
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Wyoming/Architectural_History_(Fall_2018) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Khardy1992, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hi I will be reviewing your contributions to the article "Chateau Frontenac". I will post an evaluation based on the criteria from wikipedia for peer reviews.
Your goal with a peer review is to identify specific ways the article could be improved, and note any major problems that ought to be fixed. Consider these questions:
1. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
The additions you made to the article are relevant and do not distract from the main article topic or the pre existing article.
2. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
You viewpoints expressed in the article are neutral in tone. I do not see any edits that express bias. All of your added content looks neutral and reflective of your sources.
3. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
I do not think your viewpoints were over represented. However, I think you could have contributed more material from your sources to the article.
4. Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
The links for all of your citations work and they support your additions to the article. They appear to be scholarly material.
5. Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
You provided a relevant source for each new fact added to the article. They appear to be good quality sources and I could not perceive a bias in them.
6. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?"
The information you presented is from relevant and recent sources. I think you could have added more facts though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbrown49.uwyo.edu (talk • contribs) 02:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)