User talk:KhanzotChinev

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Spyder212 (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

???

Hey Khanzot, wanted to let you know that you're being annoying with your edits on Khamzat Chimaev, you're really not contributing at all and nobody will discuss what you want to discuss because your arguments are childish and don't really hold any weight, things you say like it should be said that he's Chechen don't make any sense, Chechnya is not a country and it's part of Russia. Just because outlets call him "Khabig" doesn't mean that's his nickname at all, as it's not official and it never has been. I don't know if you just want to troll for some reason, but please, stop. PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

A nickname is a name he is known by. He may be known as Borz (unclear, because no citation has been provided). However, he is definitely known as Khabig and it would be a shame if someone was confused as to who that was referring to, went to wikipedia, and couldn't find an answer. I'm sorry if you find it annoying that I am trying to make wikipedia as informative as possible. I'm sorry that you are not open to discussion, however if that's the case then I suggest you stop using wikipedia because that sort of mindset is harmful for the growth of the platform. Besides, what is the criteria for deciding whether a nickname is "official"? You have not spelled that out. Additionally, it is entirely possible to be Chechen even though it's "not a country." You seem to have a very rudimentary grasp on the concept of ethnicity. Have you heard of Tibetans in China? Or Uighurs? They are ethnically not Han Chinese. Therefore, I suggest you either come up with good reasons for your opinions or stop vandalizing my edits. Wikipedia is meant to be unbiased. Have a great day! KhanzotChinev (talk) 16:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Dude, his nickname is NOT Khabig, provide me OFFICIAL sources of when he has been called that, bc I can make a blog and call him Tanisha and his nickname won't be Tanisha, the only official sources are Sherdog and Tapology, which both list him as Borz and not something ridiculous like Khabig.

Listen dude, you have 50 edits, you're not a high-ranked user, not superior to anyone and definitely not a helpful user to the platform, stop talking to people like you're a boss bc you're not, cut the bs. I've edited wikipedia over 3,000 times, and never had a problem like this, because you're simply not trying to help at all. I don't have "opinions" here, your reasons like "clearly wasn't written by a native" are absurdly dumb and you will have to excuse for the aggressiveness, but you're really just annoying. Like Cassiopeia already informed you, only nationalities such as Swedish and Russian are allowed in the main paragraph, not ethnicities like you were told, what did you do? You started sticking to YOUR opinions not taking in consideration what has been discussed a 100 times on the project. Funny that you now act all respectful and stuff when you already tried to troll people in here, but I'm not buying you anything dude. PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Please refer to the talk page of the article. There are several instances of him being referred to as Khabig. Additionally, I could give several examples of ethnicites being given in the main paragraph of articles. I am not sure if you know this, but experience does not always equate to competence. I never said I was a high-ranked user. I have a life outside of Wikipedia. I am simply trying to fulfill Wikipedia's mission of being a valid source of information that is freely edited by all. I think it is disgusting that for this behaviour I am criticized for being a "troll." That was very rude of you and I believe you owe me an apology. Have a great day. KhanzotChinev (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Why did you leave a message on my talk page if you're still replying in here? Articles that project their own opinion as I already exposed to you in my talk page (totally unnecessary to write there), cite just one reliable source that cites his hole info and explicitly says "Nickname: Khabig", it obviously doesn't exist because it is NOT his nickname but a funny and unofficial way people called him after his first two fights. The fact that your argument to why his ethnicity should be included was "because he would want it to be there" but now you try to call him Khabig when he has said multiple times he doesn't want to be compared to Nurmagomedov is pretty ironic.

A guy with 50 edits does not have any right to put "Welcome" signs and tell a guy to get off English Wikipedia to a guy with over 160,000 edits more than you, where have you demonstrated competence? Oh you really have a life outside Wikipedia? I thought you lived and slept in here my bad. Well, you're failing and pretty badly, not much else to say. You can stick your opinion of my comments being "disgusting" and "rude" wherever you want to, but I'm not apologizing to any troll, maybe you should start putting "Welcome" signs on your own talk page and see if you learn something. PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 16:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

I do not know why you are so upset. I am merely trying to make Wikipedia a better place. My opinion was that someone who has a poor grasp of the English language probably shouldn't be making so many edits on the ENGLISH Wikipedia. Am I wrong for saying that? And if so, why? In my opinion, you are wrong for not owning up to your mistakes and apologizing as necessary. Have a nice day my friend. KhanzotChinev (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Again, you're failing on your mission as explained, you didn't respond to 3/4 of what I wrote either. The guy is an American with over 160,000 edits and an administrator, how is he not qualified to edit the English Wikipedia and who are you to disrespect him like that? I literally care more about the watermelon in my fridge than your opinion that doesn't hold half a pounds, u gon tell me u not a troll? You didn't even refer to the "Welcome" message, what do you have to say about that? This is the 10th time you tell me to have a nice day and we aren't friends, but sure... PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 17:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

I am trying to be friendly but you are not because you have hate in your heart. Have a great day my friend. KhanzotChinev (talk) 20:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Again, you're not responding to anything, yet you limit yourself to trying to look like a "good guy" the whole time, which is obviously not helping you at all in this situation. Dude, hopefully you get banned soon, the day is almost over why do you keep wishing me a good day u try so hard lmao. PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 17:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Please calm down. There is no need to be upset. All this time I have been assuming that you have made edits in good faith, and yet it seems like you have ulterior motives. Please find peace, brother. There is no need to be so upset. Have a excellent day, my friend. KhanzotChinev (talk) 00:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

3RR

Please read the WP:3RR before continuing any actions on Wikipedia. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 02:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:KhanzotChinev reported by User:Andrew nyr (Result: ). Thank you. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm Eagles247. An edit that you recently made to Taylor McNamara seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

It wasn't a test, he doesn't seem notable enough to have a page. KhanzotChinev (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 14:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KhanzotChinev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will accept this setback and aim to be the best Wikipedia editor possible IA KhanzotChinev (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 22:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at B.J. Penn, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 07:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The nickname has already been cited in the article. See the following tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3MP7y1vMUs Have a great day my friend. KhanzotChinev (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mark Coleman, you may be blocked from editing. It is not in the source <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia^(talk) 07:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Don't worry - it is in the source. I would not have added it if it were not in the source. I think you should look again. Have you heard of ctrl+f? It is a good tool for finding things. If you are new to using computer, you might not know about it. I think you should really not be so hasty to remove other people's edits from Wikipedia if you are unwilling to do even a cursory search. It is really quite rude and hurtful to be honest. I think you owe me an apology for deleting my edit. After all, we are all just trying to make Wikipedia a better place aren't we? I feel like you are not assuming good faith, which is one of the crucial tenets of Wikipedia. Try searching ctrl+f "The Godfather of Ground & Pound" on the page I linked. It is really not so difficult as long as you have a basic knowledge of computers. Perhaps you lack this, which I would not hold against you if only you were not being so hasty in deleting other editors' contributions. I am assuming good faith and reverting the edit. Have a great day my friend. KhanzotChinev (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Please apologize for calling my edits disruptive, or I will report you for harassment. Have a great day my friend. KhanzotChinev (talk) 09:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi KanzotChinev, I reread the source and found the info. I apologies as as it was my bad. You could leave me one message in one message instead of 3 messages in 3 different talk pages actually. Do note, When it comes to nick name, we usually do not use any other nick name besides it comes from Sherdog.com for mma fighter. You source is from UFC, and UFC is a promotional company and it is related to the fighters for they fight under UFC which make the source not independent. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Post-block

Hey KhanzotChinev, my block expired 12 hours after yours and I am once again able to edit. First of all, I wanted to issue you an apology for the unnecessary roughness in my messages in our first exchange on your talk page. I'm totally open to discuss the content at Khamzat Chimaev, as long as it is a civil conversation. Let me know what you'll do. PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 15:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I am not feeling the motivation to continue fighting. I forgive you and trust that you will do what is best. KhanzotChinev (talk) 18:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

@KhanzotChinev: I'm going to guess you meant discussing over at Chimaev's article, in that case, that's ok. Also, don't forget to pin when you reply so I get a notification, like I did at the beginning. PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jen Psaki, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, please remember that edits should be taken in good faith. Perhaps your white privilege makes you think that you can talk down to minorities like this. I do not appreciate it at all. Thank you, have a nice day. KhanzotChinev (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Fighter nicknames

Hi. Please don't add nicknames to MMA articles. They are sourced to Sherdog. Thanks.NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Sherdog isn't the end all be all. I will continue adding nicknames where they make sense for the betterment of wikipedia. Thanks. KhanzotChinev (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

The infobox contains sourced information. Infoboxes are not compulsory so contain the sourced information that pertains to what the WP project in question sets out. The MMA infobox contains nicknames sourced to Sherdog.NEDOCHAN (talk) 16:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

And the info is already in the lead paragraph.NEDOCHAN (talk) 17:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at Harvard University

Please stop edit warring at Harvard University. If you have concerns about the article, please open a discussion in Talk. ElKevbo (talk) 23:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Some advice

Hi there KhanzotChinev, I come bearing unsolicited advice. We're all volunteers here, putting in some of our free time to write and maintain an encyclopedia. There are many constructive things you can do here. But I recommend you limit yourself to topics that you have a bit of personal distance from. Disagreements are inevitable. Avoiding topics that are too close to home will make those disagreements easier to parse, and much less frustrating. Once you resort to frustrated namecalling, folks will largely discount what you say and consider you a disruptive time drain rather than a productive editor. That said, I hope you're staying well. All the best, Ajpolino (talk) 05:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry to say you seem to be having trouble contributing productively here. Your edits have been reverted at Nurse anesthetist, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist, and Harvard University, which are the most recent pages you've worked on. This is a collaborative project. To be successful here, you have to be willing to learn from and abide by the rules and norms that have been developed by editor consensus to guide this project. I'll take this opportunity to reiterative my advice above. I don't know you, but it appears from the outside like you edit in topics that you feel very strongly about. When you encounter resistance, you appear to react with frustration and incredulity. Wikipedia is a large project, and in many ways a successful one. If you encounter resistance at every turn, consider that the problem may not be the project; it may be your behavior.

Please look over Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Editor time is our most precious resource here. People who edit tendentiously and whose edits are constantly being reverted are squandering that precious resource. I encourage you to find a topic that you can edit productively, so you can begin to build experience and rapport with your fellow editors. If instead you continue to cause disruption, an administrator will almost certainly end up blocking your account from editing in order to save everyone's time. I hope you're well. Ajpolino (talk) 01:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Noctor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noctor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noctor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sdrqaz (talk) 21:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tristan Connelly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tristan Connelly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Connelly (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cassiopeia talk 04:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)