User talk:KhanPakhtunkhwa
Welcome
[edit]
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 27)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KhanPakhtunkhwa/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! KhanPakhtunkhwa,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
|
August 2016
[edit]
Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tanoli, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Please note that the beliefs and claims of an ethnic group themselves are not considered reliable, and we need proper academic sources to attribute origins to peoples. We must also not use old sources to make our own deductions - for example, saying things like "As such the Tanoli most probably belong to Batani tribal confederation of Pashtuns", as that is an example of original research and/or synthesis. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tanoli, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Tanoli. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)- I gave you three clear warnings to stop adding unsourced material to that article, and warned you that if you did it again you could be blocked. You did it again, so you are blocked. Please note that this is not a result of the discretionary sanctions warning below, but simply as result of these warnings here from me. But please do read the warnings below too, and be aware that blocks will rapidly escalate if you continue to edit war to replace sourced content with unsourced content. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- And you have done the same again as soon as your last block expired. As you clearly have no intention of listening to anything you have been told and are set on adding unsourced material to the Tanoli article regardless of Wikipedia's policies, I see no other way of stopping you than an indefinite block - so that is what I have imposed. If you wish to contest the block, the instructions are in the previous block message I left you, above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Tanoli. Dl2000 (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.- Sitush (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]principle I was new user, the reason to blocked I understand, but my work is proven it is reliable. KhanPakhtunkhwa (talk) 06:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Please I want to do a better work with the major reference ,what most edition does not have and there are many erores I want to regulate. Please you must check the work of each edition before going to block.
KhanPakhtunkhwa (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
KhanKhel
[edit]KhanKhel is a sub-clan of Yousafzai tribe,
they are migrated from Swat valley ,
some khankhel call themselves swati, reason is this, because they come from swat and now better known as swati, but it belongs to a clane of yousafzai tribe, Located in the Hazara region of the Khyber-Pukhtunkhwa, and Kalabat Swabi , Hoti mardan área of Pukhtunkhwa, KhanPakhtunkhwa (talk) 23:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)