User talk:Khan197khan

Welcome!

Hello, Khan197khan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Islam on YouTube, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! QueenCake (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Ahmadiyya. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WhyDoIKeepForgetting (talk) 06:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone else warning this user should note that older warnings have been repeatedly erased: [1], [2], [3]. WhyDoIKeepForgetting (talk) 06:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Islam in Jamaica. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WhyDoIKeepForgetting (talk) 16:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Planting a Better Future. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. WhyDoIKeepForgetting (talk) 16:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.232.26 (talk) Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Planting a Better Future. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove the dead link template for links that are actually 404.[reply]

Also, please stop removing warnings from your talk page. WhyDoIKeepForgetting (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Big Crunch. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Your sources for adding a "Religious Context" section are insufficient; see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Please do not attempt to re-add the information without proper sourcing. GlassCobra 17:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Big Crunch. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted and reported at WP:AIV. 19:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think this user violated 3rr on Big Crunch. I count four total revert actions by this user on that page in the last week, but no three were within one 24-hour period, or even one 48-hour period. WhyDoIKeepForgetting (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Planting a Better Future for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planting a Better Future is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planting a Better Future until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Planting a Better Future for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planting a Better Future is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planting a Better Future (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 20:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]