User talk:Khalidmn

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Mariam83 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to contributions for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Presuming you're editing in good faith, before further reverts, discuss thoroughly. There is a 3 Revert rule that you've already violated. Collounsbury 20:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying my best. Have you warned the other user as well? He/She as reverted more than thrice. Khalidmn 20:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been blocked from editing for no apparent reason by FayysalF. I believe it is inappropriate for admins to block without warning and I intend to report these actions. Khalidmn 20:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khalidmn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Accused of block evasion. Absolute nonsense. I was in fact notified by a friend about the unfairness of the entire process and encouraged to contribute. I edited several articles about living persons, and cited sources. Two contributors kept reverting to older versions that use unverifiable sources- but one of wikipedia's rules about sourcing is: exceptional claims require exceptional sources. I asked them to use an annotated source, but they refused. I suspect admin is abusing his authority as I was not warned nor was anything discussed. Acting admin and contributors involved in edit war als appear to know each other, and appear to be working in conjunction with one another> absolute authority. I have been blocked indenititely for trying to render a couple of articles more neutral and objective. More experienced wikipedians appear to be using their leverage against a newcomer. Acting admin appears to favor certain biased views, abuses privileges to further personal preferencs. Same admin appears to have locked other pages at the request of contributos engaged in war edit

Decline reason:

Even if not evading block, 3RR still has been violated and is pretty non-negotiable. — Ocatecir ^T 04:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.