User talk:Khalid!

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!

You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some helpful links:

Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages.
Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.
Meet other new users You may want to add yourself to the Wikipedia new user log.
Assign edits to your username from before you registered.
Be Bold!
Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
Play nice with others
Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
Tell us about you
How to upload files and image copyright tags.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

∞Who ?¿? 14:59, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Salam!

Take a look att this : Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Shia Guild

Ma salam!

--Striver 16:17, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And the obligatory Vfd for anything with the word "shia" in it... Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/WikiProject Islam:The Shia Guild. --Striver 11:59, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And yet another VFD...

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Shia ranking of the Sahaba

This one is important, take a good look at it :)

--Striver 20:34, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on Nahj al Balagha, keep it up! --Striver 19:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Agree with Striver, excellent job, like your summaries on each sermon. --Ya Ali 21:48, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Giving you a Barnstar, Keep up the good work! --Ya Ali 13:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulaions, you deserve it! --Striver 13:58, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, i, not active there... im here most of the time :)

--Striver 17:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

so

can you take a look at this? [[1]] BrandonYusufToropov 15:35, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eid Mubarak

Eid Mubarak to you and best wishes. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 02:47, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eid mubarak to you to! --Striver 14:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eid Mubarak

Best wishes to you and yours, BrandonYusufToropov 16:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eid Mubarak

Eid Mubarak and best wishes from my side . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال}^/c 18:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eid Mubarak

Eid Mubarak to you and your familia. --1Muslim 17:32, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Salam

Bro, are you there? --Striver 02:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Im working on filing a RFC against Zora, i need to see how many people are around that wants to suport that. Are you in? --Striver 18:25, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A RFC is a Request For Comments. Im going to file one against Zora. It does not have any real implications, but it lets us see how people that are not involved think about her behavior. It also is a prerequisit for a ArbCom, and that can lead to warnings or banning, in the worst case. --Striver 19:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Khalid, i appreciate it a lot :) --Striver 17:52, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please vote to merge and redirect Islamofascism to Neofascism and religion...

... which is where it belongs. Vote here: [2] BrandonYusufToropov 14:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket ranking

Hi, thanks for the updates. When you update the table, please remember to update everything (including the date). In the Indian table for instance, the ranks are upto date, but the last matched played is not. Tintin 18:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:_Muslim_conflicts--Striver 21:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People reported to be born in the Kaaba --Striver 10:03, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[3] --Striver 04:30, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cricket

Hello Khalid,

Thank you for updating some cricket articles recently. Have you discovered WikiProject Cricket yet? Feel free to sign up if you want, and/or join us on the discussion page.

Stephen Turner (Talk) 13:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Salam

I need help in the Ali article. Zora is trying to delet lots of things without giving any good justification. She is starting to get the support of other, who neither are prepared to give any arguments, execpt that they "prefer" the Zora version. Look here Talk:Ali

VFD

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable Muslim reports

Back atcha!

A happy and prosperous NEW YEAR to you and yours. Zora 20:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy 2006

Hey happy new year to you too man. May you and yours have a good year under the grace of Hadhrat Fatime.--Zereshk 23:30, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A very happy new year to you and your family. And congracts on finishing the letters section in Nahj al Balagha. --Ya Ali 12:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and happy new year to :) Ill be less active for a while, but ill be back :) --Striver 02:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yazid I edit war

I've blocked AladdinSE for edit warring with you on this article. Policy says that all parties should be treated equally, but since you were trying to come to a compromise, and not doing straight reverts, I chose to simply warn you. Edit warring is not constructive behaviour, and in a situation like that, it's better to discuss possible compromises on the talk page, instead of just trying it out. --Phroziac _. o º^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 18:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eid ul Adha

Eid Mubarak Khalid!! --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 00:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eid Mubaaaaaaaaaarak to you too bro!! :)--Zereshk 19:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eid Mubarak

Best wishes to you and yours, Khalid. BYT 16:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 bin Laden video

I recently started 2006 bin Laden video. Please improve it in any way you see fit. Thanks. KI 13:55, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VFD

Misconceptions about the Shi'a is in a AFD, see the Shi'a Guild:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Islam:The_Shia_Guild#Academic_Bias_against_The_Shia

--Striver 11:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket#Categorizing_Pakistani_and_Bangladeshi_cricketers

Not sure if you noticed this discussion, but I thought you might have some insight to share. Guettarda 03:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Baghdad (1258)

Editor OldWindyBear has dug up a charge that the Shi'a collaborated with the Mongols to destroy the Abbasid Caliphate. I figured that there might be a Shi'a rebuttal to this. You might want to go to the article and check it out. Zora 09:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I'm from Hawai'i. In possession of a book called Roadside Geology of Hawai'i. Zora 03:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Misconceptions about the Shi'a

Even though the afd did not show any consensus for merge, the admin has decided that the arguments for merge where better, and has decided that the article should be merged in the already to big Shi'a Islam article, something that make no sense at all. I protested and he answered See it and make your voice heard here: Talk:Misconceptions about the Shi'a

--Striver 04:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

They want to delet ALL kind of list of Muslims, your vote is needed. Dont forget to motivate, a plain keep/delet does not count!

More info: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Islam:The_Muslim_Guild#ALL_list_of_Muslims.21

--Striver 04:45, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OpenIslampedia

Salams/Greetings,

As a member of the Wikipedia community who has contributed to articles related to Islam, I thought you might be interested in a project I am trying to get going: OpenIslampedia. Please visit the site for more information.

While it is permissible to re-use content from Wikipedia (as long as it is cited appropriately and released under their GNU Free Documentation License), it is my hope that we will be able to develop new content for OpenIslampedia, more in accordance to the needs and desires of our community and audience.

Interested? Please consider joining us! As you probably know from working in Wikipedia, every contribution counts, no matter how small.

Ulises Ali Mejias

(UlisesAli 16:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Assalamualikum, from bless_sins

Salam, I'm bless_sins. Although I'm an ex-Sunni, I'm not exactly a Shia either. I belive in complete Muslim unity (whether Sunni, Shia, Wahhabi, Arab, African etc...). I think one of the reason Muslims suffer today is becuase we are divided and continue to fight each other.

I'm not Sunni, however, I don't like it when people attack them (nor do I like it when people attack Shia). Saying that Wikipedia is "infested with Sunni POV" isn't exactly the freindliest thing you can say.

The Quran urges kindness and unity amongst Muslims (I can provide you with verse if you want). Let's all be united in the cause of Allah. Bless sins 02:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd time

Care to vote?

--Striver 23:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd of The Shi'a Guild

Should the guild go? I am the only one finding it usefull? I am a burden to wikipedia?

give your opinion, only a vote wont do:

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam:The Shia Guild

--Striver 12:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikiethics

Hi,

We started a proposal Wikipedia:Wikiethics to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal.

Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely.

Editors who thinks that it needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the policy further.

If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page Wikipedia:Wikiethics with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well...

Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 20:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikiethics

Hi,

We started a proposal Wikipedia:Wikiethics to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal.

Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely.

Editors who thinks that it needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the policy further.

If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page Wikipedia:Wikiethics with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well...

Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 20:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salam

You are welcom, hope you do well. Peace! --Striver 20:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd

Hi Khalid! I would like to inform you of this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shi'a view of Ali.--Striver 09:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Islam

Hi there, The Islam template is used in all Islam related articles and it carries an image of the mosque, if you take a close look at the other religion templates they all carry an icon that actually symbolizes the particular religion. The question is what symbolizes Islam? As a muslim you would agree that we cannot Idolize any symbol as sacred as it would be Shirk. So the next question is what kind of icon would correctly represent Islam and Muslims? It is undoubtedly the Shahada, because without it we wouldn't be muslims. So I have suggested to change the template image from a masjid to a Masjid with the Shahada in it. In order to have the image in the template I need build some consense, could you kindly visit the talk page (Template_talk:Islam) and make your suggestion, lets have the template change so it will correctly represent Islam. (You do not have to support it if you dont like it). thanks in advance. «₪Mÿš†íc₪» ^(T) 11:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

salam

I'm a Shi'a and I've joint WP recently. I want to help you with shiite articles. --Sa.vakilian 19:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator

The Shia Guild

Hi Khalid. Are you aware of the afd on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Shia Guild? Since you are a member there, i thaught you might be intrested in it. --Striver 16:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Barnstar Award

Please offer your opinion, vote, or whatever about your choice for the image to be used with the Islamic Barnstar Award at the Barnstar proposals page. Although there is consensus for the concept of an Islamic Barnstar Award, some editors would like to change the image for the award. I was just thinking you should be aware of this discussion because you have contributed to Islamic-related articles, received the Islamic Barnstar Award, or have contributed to the Islam-related Wikiprojects, etc.--72.48.104.52 16:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Info on Islamophobic group

Hello,

What follows are the thoughts, expressed in their own words, and in the 'protest signs', of the obscure, very small, but very vocal 'activist group' known as "Protest Warrior".

"What's becoming clear is how the religion of Islam is addicted to war and mayhem. Not a radical minority, not a rogue sect, but its very essence is about submission and sacrifice and proving your worth by worshipping death in this life to gain a paradise of orgies and drunkenness. Their entire history is of warfare, and any accomplishments of their so-called Golden Age has been proven to be merely parasitic off the cultures they've conquered and reduced to dhimmi servitude. That every country under sharia is corrupt, belligerent, desolate and barbaric obviously gives them no pause, except to constantly drive them into further psychotic rage as they refuse to ever accept any responsibility for their conditions. They are akin to the powers in Orwell's 1984; there must always be an enemy. It's no surprise that women are treated like property in these countries as that's the only way Muslim men can feed their egos, to dominate others rather than ever actually produce something."

Kfir Alfia and Alan Lipton, founders of "Protest Warrior"

Their 'protest signs'...

Signs

I thought you might be interested in this group's sentiments. They are currently very actively editing their own article on Wiki and there is a lot of 'group think'. Perhaps you might want to become involved in the editing and discussion process on that page. If you do, please don't vandalize, and try to remain civil. Should you not want to involve youself, please forgive my intrusion.

Protest Warrior

Protest Warrior Discussion

NBGPWS 09:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eid mubarak

Eid mubarak :) --Striver 13:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Khalid!! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Shaikh Ahmed bin Mohammed al-Khalili - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Urujul Hasan Meesum - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Urujul Hasan Meesum

The article Urujul Hasan Meesum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for nearly 2 years. Non-notable and promotional.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M4gnum0n (talk) 18:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hassan Sadiq

The article Hassan Sadiq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not seeing anything in the way of real, substantive notability here

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Khalid!! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 14:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Rafi Usmani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Rafi Usmani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Rafi Usmani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 02:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]