User talk:Kgman6
|
Image copyright problem with Image:Beck futuram2.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Beck futuram2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Pamela anderson 229462g.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Pamela anderson 229462g.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:46430-2p.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:46430-2p.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Spikelee.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Spikelee.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:3569750vegittosuperbuff.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:3569750vegittosuperbuff.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Benstilleredcarpet.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Benstilleredcarpet.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:610.gif
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:610.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
December 2007
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to List of Xiaolin Showdown characters, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 07:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding non free images to the page. Because of the image policy, we are not allowed to add more than a few non free images to a page. -- 00:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
List of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City missions
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City missions, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of List of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City missions. KurtRaschke (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City missions
[edit]I have nominated List of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City missions, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City missions. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. KurtRaschke (talk) 05:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Phil Cassidy (Grand Theft Auto)
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Phil Cassidy (Grand Theft Auto), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Cassidy (Grand Theft Auto). Thank you. Dbam Talk/Contributions 09:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
--OsamaK 18:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Recent edits
[edit]Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. MattWT (talk) 04:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Lane Maxwell
[edit]I have nominated Lane Maxwell, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lane Maxwell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 18:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 18:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Suel Forrester
[edit]I have nominated Suel Forrester, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suel Forrester. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of VH1's 100 greatest songs of the '90s
[edit]I have nominated VH1's 100 greatest songs of the '90s, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VH1's 100 greatest songs of the '90s. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. pablohablo. 08:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
The article La Rivista Della Televisione Con Vinny Vedecci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- SNL sketch that doesn't meet notability guidelines. No decent sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 05:46, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
The article List of teenage stereotypes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unnecessary page with no sources and a confusing title. I'm not convinced sources can be found on the overall topic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Noformation Talk 04:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Kitchen Boys
[edit]The article The Kitchen Boys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This article is an extended joke. Editors have attempted to "fix" it, but that just leaves it confusing and pointless; it just documents the jokester's non-notable invention. See Talk
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Speedy deletion nomination of The Kitchen Boys
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Kitchen Boys, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 15:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Barzini family for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barzini family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barzini family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)