User talk:Kgcodyjam

This is my talk page where you can leave me a message. But please be respectful and kind.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Plyjacks (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Cheers, CP 21:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hypothetical Defense

Keith, obviously this is you. But since you haven't made any edits, other than to join the WOP project, you could argue that you "just wanted" to see what was going on with the WOP project, not trying to avoid a block. That seems to be the only possible defense. A second account on Wikipedia isn't necessarily against the rules if it is not used abusively.Ryoung122 06:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's being used to evade an indefinite block, which is abusive if there is even a single edit, regardless of its merit. Cheers, CP 15:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He hasn't made a single edit yet, other than to create the account and join a group...blocks of editing privileges and blocks of talk pages are two different things. Also, Keith Cody is a mere 19 years old...he is passionate about "Ronald McDonald" and the edit wars there have appeared to be emotionally charged and a bit unfair. Such is the nature of Wikipedia, however...even Jimbo Wales's talk page is littered with Larry Sanger "co-founder" pushers...quite the irony.Ryoung122 18:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you both need to review our policy on sock puppets. I have indef. blocked this account. If Plyjacks wants to be unblocked, he needs to bring it up on his own talk page (not here, not with another account, not through another users) and nowhere else. Cheers, CP 19:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]