User talk:Kfalko01

AfD nomination of Mugs media

I have nominated Mugs media, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mugs media. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 00:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC) I have not injected me own opinions! This is absolutely ridiculous. I was planning to donate $1,000 but I think I am going to have to reconsider this unfortunately.[reply]

I dislike wikipedia.

Speedy deletion of Mugs media

A tag has been placed on Mugs media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 00:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Mugs media. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. —Caesura ^(t) 06:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have not voted for your article to be deleted. I just replaced the tags that you removed from the article. Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself. Thank you. —Caesura ^(t) 12:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Pass it along

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pass it along, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pass it along seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pass it along, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to The New Jersey Herald, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Click here for details of your most recent inappropriate edit. Alansohn (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Mugs media, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 01:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edits here? It's opinionated, and original research, and shouldn't be included. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 02:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion _(talk) 03:15, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]