User talk:Keys43

File source problem with File:Plancommandcentre.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Plancommandcentre.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 14:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keys43 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. AussieLegend (talk) 11:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evasion of a block by abuse of multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NJA (t/c) 13:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keys43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I beleive I should be unblocked due to the fact I am not a sockpuppet, I do have an autistic brother who is 14 and he does vandalism to other peoples work, I however created this account to fix up the mess he made. Keys43 (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Does your brother also have one arm? —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 23:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have no authority to place requests on hold. I have taken it off hold and reviewed it. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 23:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I too have removed an "unblock on hold" template added by the editor. Please request unblocks appropriately - this type of behaviour does not help your overall case. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keys43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want a new Wikepedia Account, sing as I cant delete this one, I am no longer interested in editing stuff accept my homepage, and by the way user:HarleyN is not a sock puppet of me, He is somebody I know, Harley Nixon, he lives a few blocks away from em, I used to be in his little Kidtopia Club, that AnthonyRK is my Dads account and he was devastated to be blocked.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Keys43 (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keys43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well Stuff the Wikepedia, they never care wrether people are new and dont know the rules. You administraters arent to fuckin serious yourselves, giving out personal info about me and telling my name and where I live and what school I went to. You Wont hear from me again.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Keys43 (talk) 05:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fair use rationale for File:Plancommandcentre.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Plancommandcentre.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keys43 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Bidgee (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keys43 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Bidgee (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keys43 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Bidgee (talk) 04:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]