User talk:KeyboardWarriorOfZion

Welcome!

Hello, KeyboardWarriorOfZion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Khazar2 (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Your recent editing history at Third rail of politics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I suggest you make your case on the talk page Two kinds of pork^Makin'_Bacon 04:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Users Two kinds of pork and Plot Spoiler have had a history of disruptive editing concerning the topic of Israel and Israel lobby's influence in American politics. I am watching this page very carefully from now on. CHECK YOUR CITATIONS! (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try this again

If you continue to add this content back on without gaining consensus you will be blocked. I could lobby to have you blocked right now as you have crossed 3RR. But I won't this time. Next time I will.Two kinds of pork^Makin'_Bacon 20:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have consistently opened the debate for you on the talk page and you have ignored the issue. And please do not threaten me with "blocking" because I know my behavior has been cordial and consistent with Wiki guidelines. I don't know if you are an Israeli or an American Jew trying to "defend" your country from any "defamation" but understand when you can't even allow things to be brought up in the dialogue, it is tantamount to censorship and totalitarianism. CHECK YOUR CITATIONS! (talk) 05:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, debate is a two way street. At issue is the sourcing, or lack of to support your position. Continue this on the talk page please.Two kinds of pork^Makin'_Bacon 06:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I put up my citations and I made it clear why Israel is a sensible entry as an American third rail of politics. By the way, don't you think it's a little ironic the way you are trying to go about removing Israel from the "third rail" discussion kinda proves my point Israel is a third rail issue? You are trying to get people blocked from even bringing it up. By the way, nice try posing as admin. CHECK YOUR CITATIONS! (talk) 06:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:KeyboardWarriorOfZion reported by User:Two kinds of pork (Result: ). Thank you. —Two kinds of pork^Makin'_Bacon 05:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. CHECK YOUR CITATIONS! (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Third rail of politics

Hello KeyboardWarrior. If you return to edit warring on this article you are likely to be blocked again. I see nobody on the talk page who supports your changes. Please wait for consensus. You can use WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard to ask whether sources are acceptable. EdJohnston (talk) 14:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston(talk) What are you talking about? Mhults7791 motioned to get Israel's relationship with America as an entry for third rail of politics and I explicitly welcomed any entry for gun control in the same entry as long as the sources were verified. I am kinda curious as to exactly how long I am suppose to wait for consensus before making seemingly rational and evenhanded edits. CHECK YOUR CITATIONS! (talk) 20:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now please don't be offended by this and think of this as a terrible accusation, but you are not an admin user that has been trained by Israelis to give Wikipedia a pro-Israel slant, are you? You and Two kinds of pork and Plot Spoiler do not know each other, correct?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Genis has been accepted

Daniel Genis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 15:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA World Cup qualification 2018 attendance after June 13

Where need in world cup (FIFA )qualification 2018 attendance file ? After June 6 because I was remember 12,224,782 lost one . Before those not before the Matches

 Zedan007 (talk) 05:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please making sure Zedan007 (talk) 05:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KeyboardWarriorOfZion. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]