User talk:Kextra

Speedy deletion of Tetic

A tag has been placed on Tetic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. superβεεcat 02:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Tetic

The article Tetic has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn (talk) 03:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, we would discourage you from writing the article due to the fact that you have a conflict of interest- please take a read of this guideline. However, if you are certain that the company is notable and that you can write the article from a neutral point of view, then feel free to write the article, but remember to cite reliable sources. J Milburn (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism? to my talk page

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page my talk page worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]