User talk:Kevinxchan
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kevinxchan, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 12:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Kevin Chan's Peer Review by Jessica Zhang
[edit]Peer review of Kevin Chan's edits of 'Exoelectrogen' article
Structure: The article is written in a manner that makes sense as it begins by discussing the general knowledge before moving onto more specific examples. However, I feel like this would be more clear if transition words were used or if the text was split into different sections. I would prefer the latter
Content: The main thing that I would focus on is adding more in depth explanations of some of the topics, and make the transitions between two topics more clear. It seems like we jumped from "exoelectrogen" to "iron chelators" and there was a bit of a gap that needs a bit of elaboration. Also, because only iron chelating agents were discussed, the reader is given a very narrow knowledge base of examples. As such, it would be nice if other examples were mentioned or discussed or at least "exoelectrogen" the concept itself be elaborated a little more. Otherwise, the article is impartial and rationalizes the significance of the topic.
Writing: The writing itself is concise. The ideas are very succinct.
Reliable Sources: There are sentences, particularly in the last paragraph, that require citation. An example is the third sentence which lists a variety of transport proteins in a certain organism. These are definitely sourced writings. The sources used seem to be heavily focused on iron respiration rather than simply exoelectrogen. Jesszha (talk) 00:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Jessica Zhang