User talk:Kevinlevin123

Removing Speedy at Sith stalker

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Sith stalker. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Sith stalker, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV

Hi Kevinlevin123, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported the issue of you removing speedy deletion templates to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sith Stalker

The article Sith Stalker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per the consensus on fiction articles, this article fails to address the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BX-series droid commando

The article BX-series droid commando has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unattributed copy/paste from Wookiepedia, entirely in-universe, unsourced. Best left at Wookiepedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Acroterion (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unattributed copy/pastes from CC-by-SA sources will be treated as copyright violations, since attribution is required. You are in effect plagiarizing other peoples' work. Acroterion (talk) 05:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]