User talk:Kevinebaugh

Hey!

Hello, feel free to leave a message here or email me. Thanks ~kevin ^talk_email 16:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Robson

I guessed you were acting with the best of intentions. Image vandalism like that tends to take place through vandalising a template that is transcluded onto the article, so editing (or even protecting) the article makes no difference. This time, the vandal hit Template:PSV Eindhoven managers, and it took a while to sort out - and then it takes a while longer for the "cleaned" version of the template to work through the system (and also readers' browser caches). I'm off to protect the templates transcluded on the current featured main page article, to try and stop this happening again later! Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 00:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, I'll start looking there next time. Thanks -kevin ^talk_email 00:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Webster Theater DYK

On 21 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Webster Theater, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

can you help me with the pages i mention on my user page. everything is explained in their discussion page. Fan196 (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not very familiar with the articles, but I will say you will need to assert notability in both articles and include more internal links. -kevin ^talk_email 17:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Nimbit logo.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Nimbit logo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it, the PNG version is being used. -kevin ^talk_email 20:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hungryhungryhypocrites-rrrfmcover.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hungryhungryhypocrites-rrrfmcover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:44, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Space (Connecticut) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Space (Connecticut) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Space (Connecticut) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. $ɱ$ (talk) · vbm · coi) 04:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Private residence" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Private residence. Since you had some involvement with the Private residence redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]