User talk:KevinPerros

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello KevinPerros!

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Everyone makes mistakes, but you can click here to see how you can avoid making some common ones.

If you are still stuck, you can type {{helpme}} here, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Or, you can join the newcomer's help chat room, where volunteers can answer your questions.

If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user, such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to be BOLD! —Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 05:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Jewish Nobel laureates, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please for each one of the laureates, find a quote from him that support the thesis of him/her to be jewish. If Einstein says that he is agnostic, so it is, period. 3/4 sources were used that say the opposit, so those sources are obviously wrong, they cannot be used, I should have removed the whole article. Or rename the article, and specify in each cell of the table, what the laureate point of view about religion is. Saying that Feynman is jew is a lie, a lie must not stay on wikipedia.

Talkback

Hello, KevinPerros. You have new messages at Jayjg's talk page.
Message added 16:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jayjg ^(talk) 16:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jewish Nobel laureates, you may be blocked from editing. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Jewish Nobel laureates shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid being banned for WP:3RR violation, please revert your latest edit. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin, there's no point in my continuing to explain Wikipedia policies and guidelines to you if you refuse to read them. Please don't bother posting on my Talk: page any more, all that can be said on the topic there has been said. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jayjg asked you not to post on their talk page anymore. Please respect that. Drmies (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two days for edit warring, as you did at List of Jewish Nobel laureates. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 20:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KevinPerros (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have stopped editing that page. My two first reverts were the same. The subsequent ones were clear refinement, taking into account the talk page discussions. Seeing the edit war I have stopped to edit those pages, waiting for a solution at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Geopolitical,_ethnic,_and_religious_conflicts From my pov, User:Jayjg is once again abusing of its network of relations on wikipedia to enforce his pov on an article about judaism. It has already been condemned for that by the wikipedia team. In that particular case, he tries to blur out the definition of jew, so as to include Feynman in the list of jew nobel prises, whereas he has publicly stated that he is not jew, religiously nor ethnicaly. He has immediately gathered 3 contributors to fight against me, who are obviously specialists of judaism (please have a look at their contributions). I wonder if those people are not in fact extremist jews trying to use wikipedia as a tool for propaganda : User:Bus_stop, User:Plot Spoiler, User:Ynhockey. Have a look at Jayjg talk page to see how nonsensical are there arguments, how they eluded my questions. As I said, User:Jayjg have yet been condemned for having acted that way. KevinPerros (talk) 21:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

19:52, 19:32, and 10:39 were clear and simple reverts of previous edits. 18:37 was your second removal of Feynman. I would take the time off and read WP:3RR so that you do not repeat your problematic editing. You may want to also read WP:NOTTHEM before any other requests here. Kuru (talk) 21:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.