User talk:KevinMichaelBradley1996
Multiple accounts
[edit]Are you editing from two different accounts, i.e. User:AerospaceAirAviation and KevinMichaelBradley1996? That's not permitted, as per WP:MULTIPLE.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 19:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Jetstreamer Talk 19:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Ethiopian Airlines
[edit]I have looked at your accusation of vandalism on User:Jetstreamer's talk page. I have had a look at the article and cant see any evidence of deliberately adding incorrect information. I also note that you reverted some of Jetstreamers improvements to the article for example adding conversion templates. As this is clearly a content dispute please address any issues on the article talk page and take care when accusing others of vandalism, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 22:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- You only care about his improvements? What about the improvements I made? All you seem to care about is the improvements Jetstreamer has made, when you clearly didn't see that he had removed some of the improvements I made. I think you should take a look at the edit history on the page and complement me on my improvements cause I put hours of research into making the page more better. And also, I only accused him of vandalism just to make him see how it feels to accuse someone of vandalism. Because I have been told that he accuses people of vandalism when it is just an honest mistake. For example on AerospaceAirAvaition's talk page, he accused the little fellow of vandalism when he clearly didn't know Ethiopian Airlines' first Boeing 787 Dreamliner was being delivered on a different day. He thought it had been delivered to them, so he changed it. But then Jetstreamer comes in as if he owns the page and accuses AerospaceAirAviation that his edits were vandalism and that he removed the content he added. Wouldn't that be considered bullying? You should know this since you are an administrator! When you think this through, and when you see that the edits I made shouldn't have been removed, please reply to this. If you don't bother, don't even think about it! --KevinMichaelBradley1996 (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
My block?
[edit]
KevinMichaelBradley1996 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is ridiculous! First off, I'd like to say I have NO RELATION with User:AerospaceAirAviation, and that I am not doing this so called "sock puppet" thing! I am a friend of his using his computer at this time due to mine having been dropped and broken! Second, this block shouldn't even be necessary because I was doing what should have been done to the Ethiopian Airlines page. User:Jetstreamer is throwing a hissy fit by accusing me of both being me and User:AerospaceAirAviation, and also removing my addition to the page. Then User:MilborneOne comes in and states that I have removed his edits and doesn't even care about the edits I made. All I can see is that you guys are picking favorites and siding with User:Jetstreamer. I wish to get my block looked at and come to a consensus. Also, yes I did accuse User:Jetstreamer for vandalism. But he does that regardless. I have heard he had accused people of vandalism when it was just an honest mistake. I wanted to show him what it feels like to be accused of vandalism! Again, I wish to get my block looked at and come to a consensus.--KevinMichaelBradley1996 (talk) 9:28 am, Today (UTC−6)
Decline reason:
Even if you are a different person, using your friend's computer, you are still in violation of policy against using multiple accounts since you have been editing (and edit warring on) the same articles as your friend. That being said, the two accounts are 
Technically indistinguishable from one another all the way back into November. —DoRD (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You lost me when your very first statement contradicted what you said in your second edit, and then you contradicted yourself (He's your friend and you "know him in person", but you have "NO RELATION" with him? Some friend you are ...) Thus it doesn't matter to me what else you have to say on your behalf, although it further harms your case that you are as tendentious and combative since your block as you often were before, and that you spend a large portion of your request blaming and criticizing others. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Comments (especially from administrators) related to any active sanction must stay per WP:REMOVE. Please do not remove them again. Toddst1 (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- You lost your privileges to edit this page with this edit. Toddst1 (talk) 00:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Block Appeal
[edit]KevinMichaelBradley1996 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is continuing from the last appeal. I have read the Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and read that if I "Refrain from making any edits, using any account or anonymously, for a significant period of time", then I could get a chance of editing. It does not matter because the computer I currently am using does in fact belong to User:AerospaceAirAviation. And no matter what, my account has been traced back to this computer. Which means you guys will mostly likely block him too from editing indefinitely. And if another account has been made, and is traced back to this computer, it will be considered "Meatpuppetry". I am usually busy, and do not have time to edit. But I happened to be free and decided to get back onto Wikipedia. What happens if I keep my word to the following first sentence. If you guys fail to accept my reason to appeal, then I might as well...................................Well I am not going to say it on here. But you will probably try figuring it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinMichaelBradley1996 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 30 January 2013
Decline reason:
For someone who's claiming to try and be truthful, the hiding of the truth - especially after you were told not to - was wholly inappropriate. As your edit/technical link to the other account go back 3 months, your story does not corroborate. I will be generous and extend WP:OFFER to you - but, if you - or the other account, or even anonymous editors from the same IP address - edit Wikipedia between now and then, this offer is withdrawn. See you in 6 months when you have matured at least a little (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note that a school IP address has also been identified as a sockpuppet that also had the same WP:TE issues as these two accounts. Note that the physical linkages of the accounts are not the only evidence. There is behavioral evidence linking these 3 accounts that speak even louder.
More to the point, I see a general pattern of WP:BATTLE (across the two accounts and the IP) and I'd be looking for assurances that that would change before considering any unblocks. Toddst1 (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Now that you've lost talk page privileges, that will be far more difficult. Toddst1 (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)