User talk:Kev62nesl
I oppose deletions as a matter of principle. The more information the more knowledge, more knowledge is a better world--Kev62nesl 08:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
However, some knowledge does not contribute and can lag the human mind. It's nice to see a fellow Bostonian. Yanksox 12:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
I believe in taking as much possible knowledge from all sources, but when you do New Page Patrol, a school child's entry (usually obscene) about their friend most likely is useless knowledge. Yanksox 13:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
The article The Erie Pub has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Only claim of notability is that it was visited by two U.S. presidents. Does not meet WP:ORG.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Elihu Adams for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elihu Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.