User talk:Kerrymonique

~--KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 10:44, 12 January 2020 (UTC)The article that I will be reviewing is about Spligelian hernias (talk) 10:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC) / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spigelian_hernia. In the article the author describes what a Spigelian hernia is and how it affects a sick person.KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 10:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

== Welcome! ==Infobox Wikipedia user

Hello, Kerrymonique, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome to the class. You might have signed up a day or two after most of the class, so I wouldn't worry that you have no communication. As long as you keep to the assignments, you should be fine. So far, so good. —Grlucas (talk) 21:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Thanks! I will do that from now on.--KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 17:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)KerryMonique I have found some sources that can be added to the article but would like some feedback. 1.Bernstein, M. (1982) The Heart of the Nation: Jewish Values in the Fiction of Norman Mailer. Studies in American Jewish Literature (1981-), (2), 115-125 (11 pages). Retrieved January 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/412055682. Mashey, B. (2008, September 22). Jewish Values in the Fiction of Norman Mailer. Retrieved fromhttps://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-200410170/jewish-values-in-the-fiction-of-norman-mailer.3. Stern, K. (2020). Archaeological Views: Jewish Graffiti—Glimpsing the Forgotten Lives of Antiquity. [online] The BAS Library. Available at: https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/magazine/archaeological-views-jewish-graffiti-glimpsing-the-forgotten-lives-of-antiquity/.--KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 00:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)kerrymconique

You made it to the end

@Kerrymonique: The semester is almost done. DCasper79 (talk) 21:40, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

	You did it!
	You made it to the end! You did it. :-) DCasper79 (talk) 19:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

’

Yay! You updated your bio. Here's a kitten. :-)

DCasper79 (talk) 22:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Dana! I love kittens and used to have a siamese cat when I was a teenager.KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 07:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique

Citation: journal article code

Bannen RM, Suresh V, Phillips GN Jr, Wright SJ, Mitchell JC (2008). "Optimal design of thermally stable proteins". Bioinformatics. 24 (20): 2339–43. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn450. PMC 2562006. PMID 18723523.

Here is a link to the Wikipedia Manual of Style for Medicine Related articles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles

Skype

What time would you like to Skype on Thursday, 1/23? I'm available from 11a–2pm. Thanks. —Grlucas (talk) 15:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC) Hi Dr. Lucas! I would like to skype at 2pm please let me know if that is okay. Thank you!--KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 20:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique

Here is a link to the Infobox code: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_medical_intervention DCasper79 (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Copy and pasted the first few paragraphs referencing "Spigelian hernia,"

Spigelian hernia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search Spigelian hernia Other names Lateral ventral hernia Spigelian Hernia.jpg Transverse CT image of the abdomen in a patient with a Spigelian hernia (arrow). Specialty General surgery A Spigelian hernia (or lateral ventral hernia) is a hernia through the Spigelian fascia, which is the aponeurotic layer between the rectus abdominis muscle medially, and the semilunar line laterally. These are generally interparietal hernias, meaning that they do not lie below the subcutaneous fat but penetrate between the muscles of the abdominal wall; therefore, there is often no notable swelling.

Spigelian hernias are usually small and therefore risk of strangulation is high. Most occur on the right side. (4th–7th decade of life.) Compared to other types of hernias they are rare.[1]

3 C's Log

Transferring information from word log. I did this wrong. I was suppose to keep a log on this page as I did different tasks. I am listing progress notes today.--KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 21:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique

Introduction

January 10, 2020 Updating course from dashboard.wikiedu.org Jan 11, 2020 Post info about self in sandbox Jan 16, 2020 Added links to to class user:kerrymonique, fooled around with how to add things to into section.

Evaluation and Research

Jan 16, 2020 Added one sentence to the Face of Grafitti article and researched other sources for information Jan 17, 2020 Finished evaluation of FOG January 21, 2020 Wikipedia January 23, 2020 Updating article. Trying to decide which article to use? Tylenol Murders or Spigelian Hernia January 24, 2020 Doing research tryiing to find more articles using Galileo January 25, 2020 Choose article (Spigelian hernia) February 9, 2020 Copy edit article in Sandbox

Complete Traning Modules

January 11, 2020 started training modules--KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 21:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique

February 6, 2020 Completed Plagiarism Training

February 9, 2020 Completed Drafting as a group trying module

February 13, 2020 Complete Moving to mainspace training moduel will try to do did you know nomination but still struggling with some issues in Wikipedia.

Reading Assignments

01/08/2020 Started reading Carroll Chapters 1 and 2 01/09/2020 Editing Wikipedia pages 1-5 01/17/2020 Carroll chs 3 and 4 01/18/2020 Started reading Norman Mailer, The Faith of Grafiti 01/24/2020 Started reading Carroll, Chapter 6 02/07/2020 Started reading Carroll, Chs. 7 and 8 02/11/2020 Started reading Carroll, Chs. 9 and 10

User Boxes

On January 9th I read how to make user boxes, I had a little trouble with this.--KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 21:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique Jan 14th added user box to sand box page

Read learning to use template =

Jan 12 2020 read how to use templates but still confused

Posting on Talk Page =

User talk page response to Lizrileymga on Jan 14, I had a question about a log

Jan 11, 2020 Need advice from peers posted to talk page in reference to article

Jan 12, 2020 needing more advice from peers. Working on revisions to my article and polishing up loose ends. Logging work in word.

Norman Mailer =

Jan 14, 2020 Read articles and did research on Norman Mailer, used library to find articles

01/16–01/22: Evaluate article, Research information about the topic, Cite sources 01/17 Read the article Mailer, “The Faith of Graffiti”; 01/18 read Carroll, chs. 3 and 4; “Editing Wikipedia Articles about Books”; Reviewed “Evaluating Wikipedia”; Reviewed Goeke, “How to Edit Your Writing in Three Passes. Jan 17, 2020 created sandbox 2 had trouble with creating a sub section/ added reference for FOG

Evaluate, Research, Cite

02/08/2020 Started writing peer reviews. Responded to my review from LizileyMga. Read some of what my classmates are doing on talk page discussions. I think everyone is doing well. Looking at my history tab to see the improvements in my entry history. I am confused and need help with pointing out errors in code??

Bibliography =

Jan 16 2020 Created bibliography of readings for the article Face Of Graffiti --KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique Jan 16,2020 worked for several hours reading articles about the history of Grafitti, someone wrote what I wanted to discuss. Will change research

FOG =

Added notes on FOG and started draft page for references @User:Kerrymonique/sandbox 1/22/2020 Working on our group article—The Faith of Graffiti and started working on my individual article (Spigelian hernia). 1/27/2020 Added to the analysis section of the FOG. I am unsure about added more content to the Faith of Graffiti since it looks great. However, I wanted to know if I could get some help adding this information: Mabey, in the background section. I found out that Mailer's second nove. Barbary Shore, was banned by critics. Several publishers rejected his third, Deer Park, and when it finally saw print, it met with mixed reviews. I though that was interesting because it didn't stop him in his tracks and seems that he has had some many successes in his life time. It might be too much but just a thought. The source is from: A woman named Lynn Neary. The article is titled Norman Mailer, Author and Social Critic, Dies at 84. Neary, L. (2020). NPR Choice page. [online] Npr.org. Available at: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16196985 [Accessed 20 Feb. 2020]. Please let me know what you think User talk: kerrymoniqueKerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2020 @JenniferMGA, Lizrileymga, Dcb1986, KatieRob27, OrchardBreeze, Amdoubleu, Benjamin Fincher, Acmunoz14, Qtwinbush45, Pfowler17, Ereed23, Bamcclure18, Kerrymonique, Markerman76, Soudeaforbes, and DCasper79:

Spigelian Hernia Article =

02/05/2020 Finalized my Topic - Spigelian Hernia

02/06/2020 Research topic facts

02/07/2020 Cite article

02/19/2020 Article was moved over to published article. I added in the summary box: The article was copied from my sandbox, and included the link User:kerrymonique/spigelian hernia

Link - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spigelian_hernia

02/25/2020 Made more additions and corrections to Spigelian hernia page kerrymcnairKerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 22:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Evaluate Capricorn Records =

February 5, 2020 Started reading the article on Capricorn records February 6, 2020 Evaluated article Capricorn Records

Evaluate Reflective Writing Article =

Finished evaluating my 2nd article for PFowler17 will let her know on talk page

Synopsis =

January 27, 2020 posted to analysis section. January 29, 2020 tried to post to the 1st section but it was deleted

Draft Notes =

February 4, 2020 contact Dr. Lucas for help, still working on draft

February 6, 2020 Working on reading through medical rules when editing a medical article

February 7, 2020 Doing more research on Spigelian hernias

February 9, 2020 Reading article online, Journals on Galileo

February 12, 2020 Making changes to Spigelian Article meeting with Dana Casper for help with editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by ------2601:C7:8200:84A0:DD0:AFE6:A3A:F2E8 (talk) 02:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique2601:C7:8200:84A0:DD0:AFE6:A3A:F2E8 (talk) 02:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique

Start Peer Articles chosen

February 12, 2020 Peer review 1st article on Capricorn Records February 18, 2020 Peer review article there was not done 2nd article search for another article February 19, 2020 Peer review 2nd article on BeBop

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Faith of Graffiti (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Faith of Graffiti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Faith of Graffiti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Kerrymonique! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

@Kerrymonique: Hello. Can you see this? DCasper79 (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Hello! DCasper79 (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Format for template: @Kerrymonique: Here is another message as a test. DCasper79 (talk) 20:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC){{reply to[[User:DCasper79

@Kerrymonique: This is a message that I am typing. Can you see this? DCasper79 (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC) I'm not sure what happened but had trouble signing in to my edititing page user:Kerrymonique/sandbox2 it will be where I made changes to the original article.KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 11:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)(User:GrLucas).

Review article

Hey Kerry. I just finished reviewing your article. If you have questions, please let me know. L Riley (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC) hi liz, thank you for the peer review. I hurt my back moving a patient at work and was on medication for 2 weeks. I am still working on improving my article but it has been a little frustrating. I will be going back over the suggestions to make it better and doing corrections this evening. I probably won't be finished until tomorrow afternoon because I work tonight. If you would look at it again, let me know what you think about my updates. Thanks so much as I still have 2 peer reviews to do.User talk:Lizrileymga|talk--KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique

User:Lizrileymga Hey! Just did a peer review here. You're doing awesome. - Paige

(Pfowler17 (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC))

User:Pfowler17 Hey! I'm confused. Did you review my article or Kerrymonique's article? L Riley (talk) 15:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks User:Lizrileymga I appreciate your feedback! reviewing my page at User:Kerrymonique/Spigelian hernia User talk:LizrileymgaKerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique. [[User:Pfowler17|User talk:kerrymonique

Peer Review

User:Amdoubleu/Baby Be-Bop/Kerrymonique_Peer_Review

User:KatieRob27/Capricorn_Records/Kerrymonique_Peer_Review

Reflective Essay

Kerry McNair Professor Gr Lucas NMAC 5108 Writing for Digital Environments February 19, 2020

Reflective Essay

Working on reflective essayKerryMonique (talk) 13:18, 23 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique

@Grlucas:Dr. Lucas Please look this over because I hope that I am on the right track? Any suggestions? I would appreciate it. Thank You -KerryMonique (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

@Kerrymonique: Yes, you are getting there. You should remove all indications that this is for a class, as that is not allowed on WP (why all the repeated elements at the beginning? Did you proofread?). Also, it troubles me that you have not yet grasped the correct use of talk pages and replying to other users. This is an essential part of this process. Also, your entire reflection has not a single link, nor is the reference sourced correctly. Again, these are essential aspects of writing and publishing in this environment. —Grlucas (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

@Grlucas: I had made some mistakes but have been successfully using the talk pages to communicate with my classmates. I am working on my reflection paper and it should have the elements you are looking for reference sources and links.KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 22:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

@Grlucas: Dr. Lucas Please look this over because I hope that I am on the right track? Any suggestions? I would appreciate it. Thank You. DCasper79 (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

@DCasper79: Thank you. —Grlucas

@Grlucas: Making revisions to my reflective essay and working on properly formatting my talk page although I have been talking to others on the talk page. Is there any more advice you could give me for cleaning up recurring elements and my reflective paper? —Kerrymonique (talk) 23:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

February 26, 2020

Reflective Essay

Reflective Essay Assignment

Critiquing Articles

The Wikipedia (/wɪkɪˈpiːdiə/, critiquing process taught me three important lessons throughout of my article evaluation. I was surprised to learn that Wikipedia could be used for my future projects as a starting point for finding research topics as well as a great place for me to continue to improve my writing and editing skills. The critiquing process also taught me how to successfully edit several pages on articles that referenced; Norris Church Mailer, The Faith of Graffiti and my chosen article Spigelian hernia. In reflection and from someone with little experience the critiquing process was somewhat challenging. I am still learning new things about Wiki markups, navigation template, and lists. In the future, I need to pay special attention to things like; poorly constructed leads, broken cite links and references that are not formated correctly.

My approach to critiquing started with reading the piece on Norris Church Mailer going over the Wikipedia critquing tutorial, and taking notes for my formal anaylis. I participated in a few discussions and gave my personal thoughts on how I felt about the article. The experience led me to do a little more research on Norris Church Mailer, find more articles and even pictures of the couple taken years ago. I even ordered the book “A Ticket to the Circus,” on Amazon.com.

The critiquing process led me to choose an article written about Spigelian hernias. The two topics were clearly different but after reading that Norris Church Mailer died of gastrointestinal cancer. I couldn't help research the diagnosis further. Somewhere along the way, I found the corelation between gastrointestinal cancer and Spigelian hernia's. After, reading more about the disease referred to as the "Unknown Primary Cancer," (CUP) presenting as a Spigelian hernia, I found out so much more than I would have ever anticipated.. As unbelievable as it sounds my mother lived exactly 11 years just like Norris Mailer with a misdiagnosis of this rare cancer diagnosis of anterior abdominal wall mass. My mom and Norris Mailer had many similarities such as; actrss, modeling, artist, marriage to an ultra successful man and a comparible demise.

Contributions

My initial contributions only a were a few sentences added to the article"The Faith of Graffiti. I posted a few questions on its talk page, recieved feedback and revised a few more sentences. I had intentions on adding to the analysis section "why the art world is still grappling with how to understand this relatively young art form style?" However, I had a set-back with my health, fell behind in my work, and do to time constraints was unable contribute more to that section. Never the less, The article turned out great, and I appreciate all the collaborative contributions that made it so much better.

In the article about the Spigelian hernia, I added more information to the lead to give the reader a broader spectrum of medical information. As, I did more research, I found interesting scholarly journals and books on my topic. I added links to help with some of the medical jargon that might be unfamiliar to a reader that has limited knowledge of medical terminology. Next, I rewrote a few sentences, that contributed citations to the signs, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and eponym sections. Finally, I added pictures, and information from a few more scholarly journals. All the while trying not to over exagerate my writing, staying neutral, and refraining from using any impartial information cited from other sources Wikipedia guidelines for medical articles are stringent. Finally, I contributed two pictures to my article; from WikiCommons, and a video uploaded from Medtube

Peer Review

When I first reviewed the article assigned to KatieRob27 at (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KatieRob27/Capricorn_Records/Kerrymonique_Peer_Review) she hadn’t finished her article and still in the process of making improvements. I chose this article because I am also a song writer, know a lot about the music industry and actually have published work on ASCAP and BMI. The lead was good but needed improvement, there was missing content in the founding section. So, I suggested that the summary could be a little broader in that particular era. I gave feedback on the final draft and felt that the new content was a big improvement from the previously published article.

The second article that I peer reviewed was an article assigned to Pfowler17 in reference to “Reflective writing,” but appeared to still be in the rough draft stages. So, I contacted the author and she told me that she hadn’t started. So, I did a new peer review for User:Amdoubleu to the article titled "Baby Be-Bop,” at (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Amdoubleu/Baby_Be-Bop/Kerrymonique_Peer_Review). After reading the piece, I found some grammatical errors, and suggested that the background be expanded upon. There was a broken link and some of the sentence seemed ambiguous. I also contacted Amdouble/Baby and gave him suggestions, to expand more on the plot, add more pictures, and even a link to some reviews.. Unfortunately, Admdouble wrote me back and told me that there weren’t any other pictures that could be added because it hadn’t yet been turned into a movie. He appreciated my feedback, agreed to expand on the summary and maybe even consider my suggestion about adding reviews. Overall, I believe the changes Admdoublue made revived that article and brought it up to Wikipedia’s standard.

I received feedback on my topic "Spigelian hernia," from Lizrileymga and Pfower17. Lizrileymga wrote that I should expand on the topic and the details needed to be more concise but she wasn’t sure if more content need to be added. Lizrileymga also expressed her limited lack of medical knowledge on the topic however the article seemed to her to be up-to-date. It was suggested that the lead be re-written and additional pictures be added. I took her advice, added content, pictures, fixed the broken links and even enhanced the article with an external link to a video from Medtube. Also, Pfowler17 gave me feedback on the content added, and suggested that I delete the term “in simple terms,” and contribute more pictures. Pfowler17's overall impression of the article was positive. She wrote that the article looked great so far. Although, when I did my first draft, I didn't know what to expect. However, my peers were polite and thoughtful throughout the process. I appreciated the feedback because it gave me the courage to be more open about asking for help when I was confused about something on the Wikipedia talk pages.

Wikipedia in General

I had an amazing experience contributing to Wikipedia. I learned so much about it's features, broad range of articles, and cultural divesity, that I would have never imagined in my wildest dreams. Eventhough, I knew it was an online encyclopedia I did not know that it was a refuge for so many volunteers, from all over the world, that give of their time, add contributions, that make Wikipedia articles much better.   There is so much information on Wikipedia that I unintentionally found myself going down several rabbit holes for countless hours at a time.   Today, I have such a different perspective on Wikipedia and will definitely be using it as a starting point for doing research in the future. I was scared to use the wiki markup code and tried to stick to using the wiki visual editor but with the help of my librarian and Professor GrLucas’s enthusiasm I stepped out of my comfort zone and found that it wasn’t as hard as I thought it would be. At first, I made a huge mistake but my professor assured me that it would be corrected which made me feel relieved. All and all I learned how to use some of Wikipedia's formating style, the importance of staying neutral, keeping content balanced, following the guidelines and citing only sources exceptable to Wikipedia’s standards. As I reflect on the last few weeks in introspection. I believe Wikipedia has been a powerful learning tool that has aided me in gaining the skills to evaluate, revise, and articulate corrections within exsiting articles in order to improve them for the sake of the reader.KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique @Grlucas: Reflective Essay @Grlucas: KerryMoniqueMcNair (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)kerrymonique

Thank you for your insights. Be sure you always double-check for typos and always fix them before you publish any content on Wikipedia. —Grlucas (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)