User talk:Keronica Grant/sandbox
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Joselv83 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/9/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Keronica_Grant |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/9/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 05/9/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good Length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | N/A |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | Good Formatting. |
| Grammar & composition | Good Grammar. |
| Other comments | Good job overall! |
Joselv83 (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Peer Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo
Date of review: 5/3/13
Name of editor: Keronica Grant Keronica_Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 2/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 4/30/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): too long
Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes
Wikiformatting: multiple sentences, correct grammar and punctuation
Other comments:
--Christina geo (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: DJames5
Date of review- 5/6/13
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**- Keronica Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Keronica_Grant/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/6/13
Date review submitted to instructor- 5/6/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)- Too long
Image (needed/appropriate)- n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)- Yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- Yes
Wikiformatting- Good
Grammar & composition- Good
Other comments- None
DJames5 (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Date of review 05/06/2013
Name of editor: Keronica_Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length of edit
Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided directly from text the text book
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided
Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting
Grammar & composition Grammar and spelling were error free
Other comments Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)