User talk:Keranu

Welcome!

Hello, Keranu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 11:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK

I understand that the Crime section in that Muslim article offended your religion, but please provide a reason earlier why you remove many parts to that article or I might misinterpet that as blanking. Happy editing!--PrestonH | talk | contribs | editor review | 16:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I have no valid reasons as of yet. I suppose the crime section does't violate any rules, but it is a very disturbing section.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keranu (talk • contribs).

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 22:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LazerDorks

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Drat (Talk) 20:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get what I am doing wrong? I am linking to a pages for further information, as the other links do.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keranu (talk • contribs).

Please read the policy and guideline pages linked to in my above message.--Drat (Talk) 20:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please copy and paste exactly what I've done wrong, I see nothing in the links you've provided.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keranu (talk • contribs).

Specifically this and this.--Drat (Talk) 12:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, even though you didn't copy and paste. Though I don't see why so many articles about games like to Game Pro when essential my site and others do the same thing Game Pro does.

Well, GamePro is a professional magazine that has been written about by reliable, third party publications, and would itself be considered a reliable source.--Drat (Talk) 09:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MindRec

The article MindRec has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG. No sources, no claims of notability, no SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 19:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]