User talk:Keolah

Welcome!

Hello, Keolah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Nufy8 02:15, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Antihero for Hire

Hey, I didn't undertsnad your comment, "This is not uncontested." Are you disputing the Alexa data or are you implying notability from some other source? - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 19:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I know what wp:prod says. What I wanted to hear was your rationale for deprodding. I am taking this to AfD then. Cheers. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 20:15, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hi, Keolah! It's doubtful that you remember me, but I used to frequent a MUD that you coded/ran. It was actually one of my favorites, but it's been so long that I can't even remember the name of it. Anyway, I don't know if you still frequent Wikipedia much, but being that you were responsible for one of my favorite MUDs, I supposed I'd stop by to say hello and thank you. Cheers! --Kuzaar^-T-C- 03:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, Rogue Winds- that was it! Not a really huge community, but it was definitely a standout for one of my favorite games due to the interesting setting, people, and codebase itself. As far as your offer to come chat some time, I'd be happy to. I'll see if I can't swing by the IRC channel some time this week- I appreciate it. :) --Kuzaar^-T-C- 13:39, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Keolah. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists. ~~~~

Proposed deletion of Chronomancy

The article Chronomancy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN dicdef.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 19:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Psyker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psyker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psyker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Josh Milburn (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]