Jump to content

User talk:Keo1274

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Shock

[edit]

Is not simple insufficient blood flow to "peripheral". Which source says that? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:27, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
Just follow the steps 1, 2 and 3 as shown and fill in the details

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them.) WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

  1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which has a button "Cite" click on it
  2. Then click on "Automatic" or "Manual"
  3. For Manual: Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details, then click "Insert"
  4. For Automatic: Paste the URL or PMID/PMC and click "Generate" and if the article is available on PubMed Central, Citoid will populate a citation which can be inserted by clicking "Insert"

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per this text

[edit]

It is based on primary sources... Best to use secondary sources. Also it is for just one country and is not a global perspective. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Rates of the various types of shock have changed over time. Since the 1970's the rate of shock relating to heart attacks has been falling, from 7% in the 1970s to 5% in 2005.[1] Along with falling rates, reports also indicate reduced mortality for those hospitalized with cardiogenic shock. The use of coronary stenting, and thrombolysis strategies has been thought to be the case of this reduced mortality.[2]"

  1. ^ Goldberg, Robert J.; Spencer, Frederick A.; Gore, Joel M.; Lessard, Darleen; Yarzebski, Jorge (2009-03-10). "Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective". Circulation. 119 (9): 1211–1219. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814947. ISSN 1524-4539. PMC 2730832. PMID 19237658.
  2. ^ Goldberg, R. J.; Gore, J. M.; Thompson, C. A.; Gurwitz, J. H. (2001-01). "Recent magnitude of and temporal trends (1994-1997) in the incidence and hospital death rates of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the second national registry of myocardial infarction". American Heart Journal. 141 (1): 65–72. doi:10.1067/mhj.2001.111405. ISSN 0002-8703. PMID 11136488. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)