User talk:Kent Krupa

A barnstar for you!

The Civility Barnstar

Thank you! I was really impressed by the constructive and non-acrimonious tone and contributions from everyone involved in the recent AFD discussion on the Alliance of Women Directors article. What could have been—with the wrong editors involved—a very nasty debate, turned into a very positive discussion. Even editors who strongly felt that the article should be deleted worked hard to find sources and fix problems with it. This is the kind of positive collaboration people don't hear a lot about in Wikipedia-land and I'd like to recognize it. Carl Henderson (talk) 19:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Service award for you

The Signator lv 2, Awarded for being a Registered Editor for 8 days and completion of 50 edits

– S. Rich (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ARBCOM decision on transgender issues notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g. hebephilia), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Just to be clear, this template is simply for your information. It is considered customary and polite to inform users of such discretionary sanctions if they edit on pages where they apply. It does not imply any wrongdoing. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for your kind words! I noticed what a sorry state the article was in before, and couldn't resist helping out. Thanks for your edits as well - this was surely a team effort! Neutrality^talk 05:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

School districts

Hi! I'd like to discuss this edit.

According to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#School_districts school districts in the United States are automatically presumed notable because they are units of local government. Not only is it likely to be created, it should be created. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WhisperToMe, you misrepresent Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, which summarizes how various types of articles have been dealt with on AfD. Since the article Yorkville Community Unit School District #115 did not exist when I made my edit to Dennis Hastert, it obviously was not the subject of AfD when you commented here. In any case, since you have now created said article, I am pleased to let stand your reversion of my edit. Kent Krupa (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok :) - Now, just as an FYI, the text says ""Populated, legally-recognized places" include school districts, which conveys near-inherent notability to school districts per Wikipedia:Notability (geography)." - In reality that means automatic notability (if any incorporated city is automatically notable, school district is also automatically notable). I was aware that there was no suggestion that AFD should be used or anything, but I brought it up for this reason: People do create articles on school districts, and these articles survive. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

An RFC about an article that you have recently commented on is ongoing at: Talk: Dennis Hastert - Cwobeel (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chelsea Manning has been nominated for discussion

Category:Chelsea Manning, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]