User talk:Kensor

Rubik's cube

Why are you changing No arrangement of the Rubik's Cube has been discovered so far that requires more than 20 moves to solve. in the Rubik's cube article to No arrangement of the Rubik's Cube has been discovered so far that requires less than 20 moves to solve.? This is not correct, I can make a single move on a solved cube which obviously will only take one move to solve so obvioulsy this is an arrangement that takes less than 20 moves to solve. If you still think you are right please explain why on the article talk page. SpinningSpark 09:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not make that edit again without first joining in the discussion at Talk:Rubik's Cube#The search for optimal solutions. At the moment your change has no consensus with other editors and has been reverted again. I do not know how to explain any better to you why you are wrong. Please read the comments on the talk page and maybe it will become clear to you. SpinningSpark 07:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)