User talk:Kenshocon

Welcome!

Hi Kenshocon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Magnolia677 (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Hodge moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Teresa Hodge, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tammarrian Rogers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tammarrian Rogers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kamakshi Sivaramakrishnan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kamakshi Sivaramakrishnan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:36, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Zatlyn moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michelle Zatlyn, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is plainly notable and the sources were sufficient. I brought it back to mainspace. -- econterms (talk) 02:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, econterms. I agree. --Ariel Cetrone (WMDC) (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello Kenshocon. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Alyssa Henry, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kenshocon. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kenshocon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. And several other. All indicative of agency work. scope_creep^Talk 22:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. I edited the articles as part of a Wikimedia editing project organized by Ariel Cetrone (WMDC). See Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Kensho_Edit-a-thon. Kenshocon (talk) 03:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kenshocon: Thanks for that. That is coolio. I'm sorry. I should have checked properly. That was crass. scope_creep^Talk 10:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Zatlyn moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michelle Zatlyn, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 13:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Teresa Hodge has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Teresa Hodge. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 11:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tammarrian Rogers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tammarrian Rogers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tammarrian Rogers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michelle Zatlyn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michelle Zatlyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Zatlyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 06:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Teresa Hodge

Hello, Kenshocon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teresa Hodge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Teresa Hodge

Hello, Kenshocon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Teresa Hodge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mark McKelvin Jr. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mark McKelvin Jr., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent, and secondary sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 20:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WALB is a reliable, independent, and secondary source. I am creating the article as part of a Meetup with Wikimedia DC. Kenshocon (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC) bonadea I created the article as part of a Wikimedia editing project organized by Ariel Cetrone (WMDC). See Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Kensho_Wikipedia_Edit-a-thon.Kenshocon (talk) 22:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark McKelvin Jr. (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Immediately submitted after draftification, without addressing the issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark McKelvin Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 22:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kenshocon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 22:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alyssa Henry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alyssa Henry, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Henry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark McKelvin Jr.

Hello, Kenshocon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark McKelvin Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Teresa Hodge

Hello, Kenshocon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Teresa Hodge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark McKelvin Jr.

Hello, Kenshocon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark McKelvin Jr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]