User talk:Kenotoo

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Kenotoo! Thank you for your contributions. I am Masumrezarock100 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 07:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Kenotoo!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot

--Kenotoo (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kenotoo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kenotoo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

I could get a cheeseburger. Ianrobertson23 (talk) 21:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Kenotoo! You created a thread called New users being treated different? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Beggars Banquet. There is a Manual of Style, specifically MOS:ALBUM#Track listing for articles and their track listing sections, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To Dan56... Please stop stalking me and talking down to me! You aren't my boss. It appears I made one minor mistake, one that shows up on many pages on Wiki, including other pages involving the Stones. I suggest you fix all of those pages too, since it bugs you so much and they been up in that matter for such a long time, long before I started to edit here. Yet if I make the same mistake, you only take issue with me on this. Why is that? If such a minor mistake is made by others in the past (and it has in this case), it should be taken care of, yes, but no, you should not put down the work of others while over-exaggerating what the problem was, especially when dealing with new editors. There was nothing that was difficult to understand in my work. Before I fixed the issues, yes, it was hard to understand what was noted under "Personnel", since the track numbers before I fixed them made no sense with the personnel info track numbers noted incorrectly to what was showing above it under "Track listing", by whoever did that in the past.... In the future, please explain kindly what the issue is to others without the drama, so the new editor can lean and not make such a mistake again. I would thank you for pointing out that minor mistake I made (and I won't make it again, it's good to know that), but since you stated a falsehood and over-exaggerated the problem, I got better things to do at the moment Kenotoo (talk) 17:45, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're accusing me of drama? Gzus, get over yourself. Take it easy, hothead. Dan56 (talk) 19:51, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There you go again Dan56!... telling me this and that like you think you are my boss. But I did read that linked to page anyway, and my, you were the very first and only editor here who it describes that I know of. You act like you know everything, and only you are right. Get over yourself, since you are no better than anybody else who edits here! Plus again, stop stalking me. There should be a page on that here if there isn't. Kenotoo (talk) 07:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have Beggars Banquet on my watchlist, along with several other Rolling Stones album articles, so I see every change made there. Would you like to reconsider your asinine assumption that I was stalking you? Dan56 (talk) 13:15, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Dan56, so when you are losing a debate, you resort to name calling and or insults like preteens do. That's clear with you, as now I'm making "asinine assumptions" according to you? There are many editors here I bet that have this LP on their watchlist, yet you and one other person (JG66) are the only 2 editors who are regularly editing and removing my work. I have asked you two before why numerous mistakes that have been up on pages here at Wiki for years, haven't been corrected by either one of you, and still have not gotten a decent answer to my question. You only edit the work of those who are new here, as I see you have done this to others here in the past, too. Keep Wiki a exclusive place where only a few that you agree with get to edit here. But you better get use to me being here, as I'm a retired old man who now has time to clean up the many messes here and falsehoods being protected by people like yourself at Wiki. I now totally understand and see why Wiki is disliked and put down by so many, and you two are to blame for it at least when the Rolling Stones pages are put down by non editors off site reading the misinformation being allowed to stand here. With that noted, you at least have at the same time tried to clean up some messes that I have pointed out (unlike the other person, as I see that there is at least some goodwill in you), so good for you on that. Now if you could just act your age and stop with the name calling and bulling. Kenotoo (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So your answer to my question is no, then. Dan56 (talk) 19:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for you, that you have been taking this so personally. But I care more about facts than feelings, and you again presented LP-format sides with incorrect track numbers, which violates not only the style guide that has been referred to you several times in previous discussions elsewhere by others, but also, on a basic level, correctness of information being presented to readers. So, I am not sorry for issuing you a standardized warning regarding this when you have repeatedly made similar changes to other articles and continued so at Beggars Banquet. With that said, given your emotional reactions to such small matters as being on Wikipedia to the detriment of your temperament and health, I am concerned, and I strongly recommend you take a break. You have shown yourself incapable of restricting your opinions to the content of articles and not the editors involved, which is toxic and unbecoming of someone your age (if you are going to continue demeaning me with your intellectually useless and irrelevant comments about my being younger than you), and also a point of emphasis at the "hothead" essay I offered you earlier to read. So if you ping me again, it will be ignored. Dan56 (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dan56 wrote: "So if you ping me again, it will be ignored"... You promised me this over a week ago and you haven't ignored me yet, I wish you would. In regard to your text in the last paragraph, I noted when I changed the track numbers to cosponsored to what another editor wrote under the Personnel part of the page, which made no sense, since the numbers showing didn't exist in the track order that was showing. When I made the change, I noted that the track numbers were now showing as they do on the CD and stream versions of the LP and not for the original vinyl record. This is 100% allowed to be shown on the page - but - I learned later on that the original vinyl release has to be shown too (my mistake there). I noted on the page in question this won't happen again, so why do you bring it up like it's a current issue, when it was cleared up last week? Also, while I might be an old grandpa, I'm in pretty good shape for my age - with just one exception that has nothing at all to do with my mental health, which is sound. Perhaps you need a break from here and not I, as I just got here, yet you seem to live here day and night. BTW, when you start to act your age - I'll be happy to drop the fact that you are so young. Please stop acting like a child here and stop the name calling if you don't wish to be called out for acting like a preteen! Kenotoo (talk) 21:16, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]