User talk:Kenosis247

Welcome!

Hello, Kenosis247, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 19:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kenosis247, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Kenosis247! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Combined oral contraceptive pill

Hi, you are currently engaged in an WP:editwar at this page, where you are trying to include information that other editors consider improper. You have already reverted four times which is a violation of the socalled "three revert rule" which says that no editor may revert more than three times, and that reverting more is a valid cause for one's account to be blocked. I think you are probably a new editor and unaware of these rules, so don't worry. What you need to do at this point is to go to the discussion page and write why you think including the material is important. Then if there is a consensus among the editors to include it it will be included, and if there isn't it will not, or perhaps there can be established a consensus to include it in another form. The problem I see with the material you include is that you are basing it on a very new study published as a primary source. In medical topics we have a very strict policy of sourcing and we only accept the highest quality of secondary sources as laid out in WP:MEDRS. This is because primary studies contradicting well established medical views are published all the time, and most of them turn out to be wrong and are not accepted as valid in the literature. Therefore we do not include new medical studies, untill they have been met with general acceptance in the field. This is in order to avoid giving people problematic medical advice, since many people rely on wikipedia for nderstanding illnesses and treatments. Ergo, we only include medical studies that have been generally accepted as valid by the profession.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 18:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Donald Wallenfang has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Donald Wallenfang. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Wallenfang (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See comment. This draft needs better references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Wallenfang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald Wallenfang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Wallenfang (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please publish your resume on LinkedIn, not Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Wallenfang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald Wallenfang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 17:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Donald Wallenfang has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Donald Wallenfang. Thanks! Catrìona (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Wallenfang (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Newslinger was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia isn't a site to host resumes, so please pare down the "Publications" section to just several entries, preferably the most important ones that relate closely to the rest of the article. You can also summarize the key points of his publications in the article, but this should be done in prose, not as a list.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Wallenfang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald Wallenfang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Newslinger talk 15:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Wallenfang (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:PROF and the page makes fantastical claims about his influence on practical theology

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Wallenfang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald Wallenfang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Donald Wallenfang

Draft:Donald Wallenfang, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Donald Wallenfang and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Donald Wallenfang during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 18:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Donald Wallenfang concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Donald Wallenfang, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Donald Wallenfang

Hello, Kenosis247. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donald Wallenfang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]