User talk:Kennabenna0220

Speedy deletion of Mallory Tracy

A tag has been placed on Mallory Tracy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g10.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Laaabaseball 01:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Oober

Oober, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Oober satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oober and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Oober during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Captain panda 03:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Abby83 03:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Love. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Love was changed by Kennabenna0220 (c) (t) replacing content with useless junk on 2007-10-03T00:56:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 00:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Elmo, you will be blocked from editing. —Salmar ^(talk) 01:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it matter?

In response to your comment (misplaced, I might add; it should have been to my talk page), it matters because everything on Wikipedia is not fake, and it stays that way partially through the efforts of people like me, and many others who undoubtably work much harder than me, to stop people like you from making it all fake. —Salmar ^(talk) 01:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User and user talk pages

In the future, please do not make unnecessary edits to people's user pages; if you wish to leave them a comment, you should do so on their user talk pages. For example, if you wish to respond to this, you would not, again, leave your comment at the top of User:Salmar, but, rather, at the bottom of User talk:Salmar. Thank you. —Salmar ^(talk) 01:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if you think I have been rude. While I probably was less polite than I could/should have been, you were vandalizing Wikipedia and calling it "completely fake". If I offended you, I am sorry.

As for talk page comments: it is, for the most part, considered "bad" to make unnecessary edits to someone's user page (as you have been doing to mine, User:Salmar). Therefore, if you wish to say something to me in the future, please go to this page: User talk:Salmar and leave your comments there, at the bottom of the page. Not only is this the proper place for them, when you leave a message there, I will see a large yellow bar with the words "You have new messages" at the top of my screen, so I will know right away that you have done so. Thank you. —Salmar ^(talk) 01:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and there is no need to apologize. The page you posted your most recent comment on was the correct one. As for being confused: I realize that Wikipedia can be a confusing place; if you plan on sticking around and becoming a contributor, please feel free to ask me for help on my talk page.

And yes, I realize some of what Wikipedia contains is incorrect. We, as it's editors, are only human after all. But, at the same time, we do do are best, which, in my opinion, is often times quite good =) —Salmar ^(talk) 01:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Please do not vandalize pages. Your message, "UR PAGE IS OOBER,MINES WAS TOO.... UNTIL U DELETED IT!!!!!!! >:( NOT COOL" was taken into consideration. First of all, non-administrators do not have access to deleting articles. They can only tag pages as deletable. Thank you. Laaabaseball 21:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]