User talk:Kend305

Welcome!

Hello, Kend305, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - NYC JD (interrogatories) 11:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Blue Marlin Corp.

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Blue Marlin Corp., by Gay Cdn (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Blue Marlin Corp. is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Blue Marlin Corp., please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Blue Marlin Corp. itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Scurlock

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article James Scurlock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Australia luxe collective

A tag has been placed on Australia luxe collective, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. role^player 02:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ugg boots, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ugg boots was changed by Kend305 (u) (t) deleting 8112 characters on 2009-07-11T02:25:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Australia Luxe Collective. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:24, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Australia Luxe Collective

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Australia Luxe Collective, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Just one of many manufacturers of Ugg boots. Zero gnews hits; company website is "coming soon". Gsearch turns up lots of shopping hits, but nothing that gives any indication of meeting WP:Notability. G11 speedy tag removed by article creator; because this is only a borderline ad, I'm going the prod route instead of replacing it.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Australia Luxe Collective

An article that you have been involved in editing, Australia Luxe Collective, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia Luxe Collective. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. role^player 08:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]