Jump to content

User talk:KembanganGreen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

INJ in tables

[edit]

If I can refer you to the following discussions where the format for the tables was set: here and here --Falcadore (talk) 07:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rúbéńs Bářřǐĉħèľľó listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rúbéńs Bářřǐĉħèľľó. Since you had some involvement with the Rúbéńs Bářřǐĉħèľľó redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IIIVIX (Talk) 08:18, 6 October 2009 (UTC) IIIVIX (Talk) 08:18, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The other redirects you have created, such as 2009 Malaizijos Grand Prix have also been questioned at the RfD above. What are they, Lithuanian? Generally such redirects are are not considered helpful. Is there any special reason behind these? -- ToET 23:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rúbéńs Bářřǐĉħèľľó, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. B.Wind (talk) 06:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KembanganGreen. I just saw your note over at User talk:B.Wind#I don't know what are you talking about, and unless I've missed something looking at the edit histories, I think that there has been a miscommunication. In the note above, B.Wind in not accusing you of removing anything, but is telling you that he has tagged the redirect Rúbéńs Bářřǐĉħèľľó (that you created) for speedy deletion, and reminding you that if you feel the redirect should not be deleted, you should not remove the current template, but should apply a {{hangon}} template. When you wrote, "Besides, i don't know which page i just "DELETED" the speedy deletion thingy", I think that you were saying that you didn't know what page he accusing you of having delete something on (which he didn't) and he interpreted that as you saying that you had deleted it (which you hadn't). In any case, we would appreciate your input at the RfD discussion as most of the redirects you recently created appear to be unhelpful. It would help us if we understood the reason for their creation. -- ToET 08:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello KembanganGreen, as you can tell by the link turning red, that redirect has been deleted. We would still like to know what your intention behind the other redirects were. Are they Lithuanian? Answering here is fine. -- ToET 15:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as 2009 Formula 1 Winter Series, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.

Also note that Wikipedia is not for you to use as a host for your imaginary racing world. IIIVIX (Talk) 19:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet User:Fen grip

[edit]

I notice you have just created a new User talk page at User talk:Fen grip. It is strictly forbidden to operate more than one WIkipedia account, there may be ground for a Sock puppet investigation, which would see you banned from Wikipedia if correct. Is the Fen Grip account yours? --Falcadore (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes on their respective user pages would suggest that User:KembanganGreen and User:Fen grip are 11 and 13 year old brothers from Singapore. They may be sharing a computer and intermixing edits. I believe the greater issues here are WP:NOT#HOST and WP:CHILD. -- ToET 22:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2009 Malaizijos Grand Prix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- ToET 23:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have attached a request for deletion of 19 separate redirects at Talk:2009 Malaizijos Grand Prix#19 redirects for deletion via R3. -- ToET 23:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And they have been deleted. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask here (I'll keep it watched for the next few days or so) or on my talk page. If the future, if you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. The following pages are often useful to new users:
And most of all, please make an effort to communicate with other editors, on user or article talk pages, when problems arise. -- ToET 07:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and part of good communication includes providing an informative edit summary. -- ToET 06:20, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate pages

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as 2009 Formula 1 Winter Series, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Yong nyuk lin

[edit]

Your edit to the redirect Yong nyuk lin (replacing the {{R from other capitalisation}} tag with an equal sign) was not helpful and has been reverted. In the future please ensure that you fill in the Edit summary so that other editors can understand the purpose of your edits. -- ToET 14:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2009 Deutsch Grand Prix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ToET 14:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And it has been deleted. Please discuss your plans with other editors before creating more of these redirects. Thank you. -- ToET 00:11, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid edit waring

[edit]

When an edit of yours is reverted by another editor, do not undo that reversion, particularly without comment. If you are certain of the correctness of your edit and you can explain the reasoning in your edit summary then such a edit is acceptable, but in all other cases you should first seek to communicate with the other editor either on the article's talk page or on that user's talk page. -- ToET 15:13, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Prix practice times

[edit]

If I can refer you to this archived discussion it willo show that it is not the policy of the Formula One Wikiproject to include practice times. Wikipedia policy WP:STATS comes into play here.

Additionally, the use of colours in tables except in very small doses is not used as it very easily becomes overpowering in its use and can make it hard to read and colourblind will much difficulty reading some variations. --Falcadore (talk) 09:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I may add, the format of displaying the results of the 700-800 odd Formula 1 Grands Prix has taken years to perfect and is consistent across the the 60 Formula One seasons. Please do not change it, at the very least without raising what you would wish the change at the F1 Wikiproject discussion page. --Falcadore (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Latest G1GP

[edit]

A Grand Prix is made up of more than just the race. Qualifying is generally included, along with the race. If, for example, a driver qualifies but does not take part in the race (Massa in Hungary, Glock in Japan, etc.) they are classified as 'DNS', but they are still classified. I find it slightly weird as well, but I have got in trouble before for not changing it early. :) Apterygial 07:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in GP articles

[edit]

If you want to play with the flags or experiment, use your sandbox. Changing all the drivers' flags to those of their home regions, towns or counties is hardly something whch other editors will support, is it? Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]