User talk:Kelvinflanagan

Concern regarding Draft:Derek Bowler

Hello, Kelvinflanagan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Derek Bowler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Derek Bowler

Hello, Kelvinflanagan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Derek Bowler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derek Bowler (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Derek Bowler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kelvinflanagan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Derek Bowler

Hello, Kelvinflanagan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Derek Bowler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eyewitness Textures: User-Generated Content and Journalism in the Twenty-First Century

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Eyewitness Textures: User-Generated Content and Journalism in the Twenty-First Century, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Eyewitness Textures: User-Generated Content and Journalism in the Twenty-First Century where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Guliolopez (talk) 12:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV/COI

Hiya. And a belated welcome. As you expand your contributions to Wikipedia, please consider taking a quick look at the guidelines on:

WP:NPOV. Which confirms the neutral tone/language expected in articles. Turns of phrase like "a book by a diverse group of journalists and practitioners [..which..] explores the creative adaptation and strategies employed [..] in response to transformative technological changes" is perhaps better suited to that book's dust-jacket or marketing materials than a neutral encyclopedic entry. Similarly, something like "he leads a global team of digital verification journalists and OSINT investigations specialists" is perhaps better suited to someone's LinkedIn profile than a neutral biography. In particular where such phrases do not appear to be directly supported by linked sources.
WP:COI. Which talks about how, where relevant, editors with a connection to a subject should consider declaring that connection. And should consider, with an eye on their own goals and those of this project, whether writing about connected topics is appropriate.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. Really appreciate the feedback. Kelvinflanagan (talk) 18:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derek Bowler (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not sure that this meets WP:GNG - whereby the subject has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - or WP:JOURNALIST - no significant (and critically reviewed) body of work yet. There are several passing mentions of, or credits to, Bowler in the citations provided, but no detail or depth beyond his roles. Prior to some editing, claims of him co-authoring a book were clearly exaggerated. Bowler may achieve prominence, but it could currently be WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Derek Bowler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 12:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eyewitness Textures: User-Generated Content and Journalism in the Twenty-First Century

Hello, Kelvinflanagan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eyewitness Textures: User-Generated Content and Journalism in the Twenty-First Century, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]