User talk:Kellz 246

December 2021

Hello, I'm Squared.Circle.Boxing. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tommy Fury have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. – ².O.^Boxing 00:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathan Kellman vs. Jacob Sanders for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Kellman vs. Jacob Sanders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Kellman vs. Jacob Sanders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 01:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathan Kellman vs. Damari Inniss for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Kellman vs. Damari Inniss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Kellman vs. Damari Inniss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 01:11, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kellz 246, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 01:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jake Paul, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TylerBurden (talk) 18:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jake Paul. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 08:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jake Paul. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Continued complete disregard for use of sources on a BLP, I have added the source for you this time, but continue making unsourced edits and you are likely to be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 13:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jake Paul. This is the last time I do your work for you, you are competent enough to create new sections and add main articles, so you must be competent enough to add sources to support your edits. When it's big news, it's very easy to find sources. There just is no excuse. Next time it happens, I will report you. TylerBurden (talk) 02:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jake Paul vs. Tommy Fury

Hello, Kellz 246. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jake Paul vs. Tommy Fury, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jake Paul vs. Tommy Fury

Hello, Kellz 246. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jake Paul vs. Tommy Fury".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]