User talk:Kellystick

Any suggestion is welcome here !!

Welcome!

Hello, Kellystick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! I'll be happy to help you with the Bupenda Meitei article. What do you have in mind?--v/r - T P 18:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kellystick (talk) 09:24, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bupenda Meitei

{{help me}} Help me in removing orphan tag from Bupenda Meitei & please assess it by rating it. How would we do that ? T Paris,thanks ,hope for your helpKellystick (talk) 09:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please wait a few minutes,~~ Chzz ► 12:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u Kellystick (talk) 12:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed and edited the article, and the 'orphan' issue is of low concern; much more important is the referencing.

First - please note - if you have a close connection with the subject of the article, then you should be very careful; if that is the case, it would be best if you did not actually edit the page, but instead made suggestions on the talk page of the article, Talk:Bupenda Meitei. Please read WP:BESTCOI and WP:AUTO.

All information needs a reference to a reliable source.

Reliable sources are publications such as newspapers, books, or news-websites - with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, and editorial control. Blogs, and self-published sources, are not appropriate.

Please read WP:BLP for further information. Thanks, Chzz ► 12:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will give you some links related to it . Please take care of it . could u ?Kellystick (talk) 12:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have already given suggestions to Peter C. to assess it , if you can , please proceed for it.Kellystick (talk) 12:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

from google source - http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=Bupenda+Meitei+%2C+Sainik+School+Imphal&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=

To show that he was a student in Sainik School Imphal from the official ex student list of the school run under the Ministry of Defense,India. 1912 was his school number,please see 1912 with his name Ningombam Bupenda Meitei http://www.ssimphal.nic.in/Ex_students8.htm

To show regarding the royal linkage and Maharaja Kullachandra, please see http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&q=Maharaja+Kullachandra&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= & http://themanipurpage.tripod.com/history/puwarimeitei.html

Other materials which cant be sourced can be removed. Kellystick (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

March 2011

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bupenda Meitei, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 13:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bupenda Meitei. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Becky Sayles (talk) 08:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published sources

When it says ^{[non-primary source needed]}, and It may contain improper references to self-published sources, that does not mean we think the article was written by the subject; it means, we think the reference used was written by the subject.

Not "self composed", but it may contain improper references to self-published sources.

Please see WP:SPS and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Avoid self-published sources.

Also please note that "google search" is not a reliable source. Chzz ► 09:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]