User talk:Kellyhernandez01

Welcome!

Hello, Kellyhernandez01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 20:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to All About That Bass, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Akon with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 03:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haddaway related articles

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Haddaway. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Harout72 (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wtwilson3. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Arnold Schwarzenegger because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 13:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avril Lavigne

In the cite used at the start of the Avril Lavigne article she says "I'm also a French Canadian". So this is what the article should say. It's not up to Wikipedia editors to decide she's not. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Wtwilson3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Neill Blomkamp without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 18:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm IPadPerson. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sofía Vergara without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IPadPerson (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kellyhernandez01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I intend to edit articles and make them more accurate. I need good explanations and valid reasons as to why some of my edits are not acceptable or correct. This is not an account of vandalism

Decline reason:

The vast majority of edits of yours I checked consisted of the removal of reliable sources and the content based on those sources, at times edit-warring about the removal. With edits such as this one you reduced accuracy. Huon (talk) 22:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is not less accurate, as he was born and raised in Austria and came to the United States as an adult.