User talk:Kelchango/Tapestry of Creation
Peer Review!
[edit]- The lead section of the article is concise and very easy to understand! The original article had a much larger jumble of a lot of information that wasn’t entirely necessary for a clean and understandable lead section. It also wasn’t originally organized throughout, so there is a massive improvement here!
- The updated article has a clear structure that is easy to follow, making it much easier to find specific information that one might be looking for. As previously mentioned, the original article lacks structure throughout the entire thing, so the added structure of the sections cleans up the article quite nicely. Headings and subheadings are clear and relevant!
- Overall, there is a good balance of information in the updated article that is backed by the sources utilized! Some sections are ever so slightly longer than others (couple of sentences), however, I feel that it is necessary and relevant to the section it is in. I can’t word this well, but basically, I mean that some sections warrant a bit more length than others! Again, the original article has no division of sections, making all of the information jumble up in a chaotic/unbalanced way.
- Content is neutral and does not appear to be leaning towards a specific bias. Information is provided in a clear and neutral manner, making things easy to understand overall. Reading over the original article, I didn’t notice an apparent bias either, so it’s all good!
- All sources are reliable and provide relevant information! Great work! Szlauraa (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)