User talk:KeithOtron

Welcome!

Hello, KeithOtron, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Mall of the Americas ·, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kotiwalo (talk) 09:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mall of the Americas ·

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mall of the Americas ·, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kotiwalo (talk) 09:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mall of the Americas ·

A tag has been placed on Mall of the Americas · requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 09:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mall of the Americas

Do you have a rationale for reverting my edit? I have also noticed that you have made other reverts like this. I suggest that you read the policy on ownership of articles. Exert 00:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because I wanted it the way it was. If I wanted it any other way I WOULD HAVE WRITTEN IT THAT WAY! If you are going to add something to an article, then add something that contributes information. Not removing punctuation.KeithOtron (talk) 02:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You do not own the article, and the extra punctuation provides no purpose. Exert 02:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, what has no purpose is this conversation. If you are going to add some information to the article then do so if not bugger off. Trying to get it deleted doesn't hlp the article now does it smart guy? KeithOtron (talk) 06:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

–Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KeithOtron (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Take your block and shove it up your lilly white ass.Most ofthe information on here is incorrect anyway. I edit and I get blocked because someone else belives the article should be worded differently? Kiss my fucking ass!! You can take my account and go fuck yourself with it asshole!!

Decline reason:

No valid unblock reasons given. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you continue your disruptive editing, you may be blocked indefinitely. Thank you. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen quite enough. This account is indef blocked now. If the user decides they want to edit again, they can email the unblock list. Jehochman ^Talk 00:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]