User talk:KdimaJdiiid

Speedy deletion nomination of Bëłkã Jūįčÿ

Hello KdimaJdiiid,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bëłkã Jūįčÿ for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GIVE UP

Hello KdimaJdiiid,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged GIVE UP for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Bëłkã Jūįčÿ, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Bëłkã Jūįčÿ. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue with the same behavior when your block expires, you should expect to be reblocked for a longer period, possibly indefinitely. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The block has been raised to indefinite, as you have continued to create the same articles using a different account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]