User talk:Kdevidas
November 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Royal Knights Motorcycle Club, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) 08:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Royal Knights page is created for awareness purposes; the speciality of the club is its group rides.
- Please read this policy and this should explain why the article fails notability. ArcAngel (talk) 09:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Royal Knights page is created for awareness purposes; the speciality of the club is its group rides. Kdevidas (talk) 09:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- That doesn't make it notable, sorry. ArcAngel (talk) 10:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Royal Knights Motorcycle club has been in the city of Bangalore for the last 4 years. Royal Knights have been contributing to the heritage of Country by touring to many places around India on the Legendary motorcycles. Royal Enfield has its one and only base in India and the Bullet is the only motorcycle to have the same construction for the last 50 years which obviously makes the classic a legend.
Royal Knights have a method in riding, all members ride together in a staggered or a single file formation depending on the road, Royal Knights is the only club in India which follows hand signals to fellow rides and does believe in group/pack riding.
Royal Knights insists on adhering to all road rules and also riding motorcycles in a responsible manner. Touring through long distances, Royal Knights have been instrumental in building enthusiasm and enabling budding riders to develop their passion for adventure and photography. Kdevidas (talk) 09:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)
If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Jafeluv (talk) 09:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Ambat_sivarama_Menon.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Ambat_sivarama_Menon.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 09:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)