User talk:Kcandrsn
Hello Kcandrsn. Welcome to Wikipedia! This is a website where everyone is welcomed to pitch in their own knowledge to just about anything in the world's most up-to-date encyclopedia.
The quick links to Wikipedia are on the left side of every page. Here're some links that you should take time reading them (don't worry, they're short and very easy to understand)
If you need help, simply go to Wikipedia:Questions or ask on my talk page. Last thing, don't forget to sign your name when you do edits on a talk page. Signing a page is as easy as typing four tildes (~~~~). I hope that your experience in Wikipedia will be a memorable one.
OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For adding an environmental section to Continental Airlines, I award you the "bring your seatback upright, secure your traytable, and fasten your seatbelt" barnstar! Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 00:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC) |
Hello, Hypothetic-Realist. You have no new work in your sandbox. You are to have two environmental sections written, with sources. These paragraphs should fulfill the criteria listed on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Environmental Record Task Force, under the "How to write an Environmental Records section." We must workshop our paragraphs in class. Mcwabaunsee (talk)
Please Investigate Problems on BP (British Petroleum) Wikipedia Page: Intentionally Burying Section on Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster, Changing Name of Oil Disaster to Hide it
[edit]Any attempts to correct this (following reasonable Wikipedia guidelines) are met with aggressive reverts and edits. Intentional spinning and manipulation of article in favor of BP? Can this task force investigate this?
Currently there is no easily recognizable section on the current Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster, surprisingly since the US Government has held BP responsible. Instead the "Oil Disaster" Section in the article keeps being given obscure (hard to recognize) names (as if someone is trying to hide the section from the public).
That section also keeps getting pushed to the bottom of the article (attempts to bury it)?
It's as if the BP Public Relations department has staff people who are aggressively spinning the article. Could you take a look? Do you know anyone else who could take a look at this? Thanks!