User talk:Kbr1656
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1
[edit]So who is George?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- George Weasley, twin brother to Fred. Older brother to Ron and Ginny Weasley. Younger brother of Bill and Charlie Weasley. Son of Arthur and Molly Weasley. In the book, Snape is the death eater who hits George with Sectumsempra spell, which takes off his left ear. Kbr1656 (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Doesn't it seem kind of jarring, though, that George comes into the plot out of nowhere with no context? He's not in the cast, either.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think so. As far as the film goes, which the article we are discussing is the film, they don't even show Mad-Eye Moody get killed, but they show George coming home with his head covered in blood. There's a moment when everyone is gathered around his unconscious body, seemingly unsure whether or not he will even live. Once he awakens, Bill adds to the tension and says, "Mad-Eye's dead." So to include one, but not the other doesn't seem to make sense since they are weaved together in the main action sequence of the early portion of the film. The fact that he isn't listed in the cast is odd, considering he is quite an essential character in all of the books/films. But I don't even want to get into a cast list discussion because some people get heated with those. Kbr1656 (talk) 02:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Frankly, I think we (someone?) should either add some context as to who George is in the plot, or add him to the cast section, or both. Otherwise, a reader (like me, who's even seen the film but didn't remember), won't know who he is.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think so. As far as the film goes, which the article we are discussing is the film, they don't even show Mad-Eye Moody get killed, but they show George coming home with his head covered in blood. There's a moment when everyone is gathered around his unconscious body, seemingly unsure whether or not he will even live. Once he awakens, Bill adds to the tension and says, "Mad-Eye's dead." So to include one, but not the other doesn't seem to make sense since they are weaved together in the main action sequence of the early portion of the film. The fact that he isn't listed in the cast is odd, considering he is quite an essential character in all of the books/films. But I don't even want to get into a cast list discussion because some people get heated with those. Kbr1656 (talk) 02:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Doesn't it seem kind of jarring, though, that George comes into the plot out of nowhere with no context? He's not in the cast, either.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Out of the Furnace may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Out of the Furnace may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)