User talk:Kazrak
Items prior to 23 June 2006 have been moved to /Archive1
Of course there are links to Lord Darcy for the fictional character, but the number of links for the fictional character are outnumbered by one alone of the real ones e.g. What link to Robert Darcy, 4th Earl of Holderness, and I am in the process of writing up another. There are plenty of unlinked references to Lord Darcy referring to one of the real ones. Jooler 21:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Wallechinsky
[edit]I have neither praised Khameni (where did that come from???) nor attacked Mubarak. Please note that I have added facts, no opinions. I in fact have nothing to say in the article whether the list is terrible or wonderful. The facts have been added to enable the readers judge for themselves the validity of the list of "Top 10 Dictators", which is what Wallechinsky is well known for compiling, hence relevant to an article about him. NN 00:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Cadderly Bonaduce
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Cadderly Bonaduce, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadderly Bonaduce. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fool'sErrand-MacSun'sMap.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Fool'sErrand-MacSun'sMap.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Kazrak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The file File:MicroKNexComparison.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
File:MicroKNexComparison.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MicroKNexComparison.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
