User talk:Kaylor2012

Image tagging for File:Tweenies jake.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tweenies jake.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stephanie.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stephanie.jpg, which you've sourced to LazyTown character page. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc Public (Talk) 22:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please do not remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Stephanie.jpg, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Mlpearc Public (Talk) 22:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a file deletion tag from the file description page of a Wikipedia file without resolving the problem that the tag refers to, as you did at File:Stephanie.jpg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mlpearc Public (Talk) 22:52, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tweenies jake.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tweenies jake.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc Public (Talk) 23:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Alaska Rural Communications Service, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Alaska Rural Communications Service. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaylor2012

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. "Pepper" @ 13:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Hi - you have to keep your user page and user talkpage at User:Kaylor2012 and User talk:Kaylor2012, respectively. Kaylor2012 is in article space, and should not be as it is not an article. As so, I've move everything from Talk:Kaylor2012 to here. Feel free to ask me a question here. Thanks, "Pepper" @ 13:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited KCER Digital Broadcast Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tiny Pop. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bonusballs (talk) 09:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move this page, or have it deleted, as you did before. Records of messages on user talk pages must be kept. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with KCER Digital Broadcast Center. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Bonusballs (talk) 00:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to FoxBox (sports). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article KCER_Digital_Broadcast_Center. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Bonusballs (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stephanie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stephanie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated addition of hoax material into articles

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at KEWI, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bonusballs (talk) 15:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Jr.

Why did you put the shows that is coming to nick jr? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.10.249.147 (talk) 04:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to believe you, but I'm afraid we need proof that at least some of those shows are really comming back (or comming as in the cases of shows such as "The Mr. Men Show") to Nick Jr. Do you have any sort of source, or is this really another hoax (like what happened here in the summer of 2009)? If you have proof, please put it in the article; Wikipedia can help you insert this proof into the article.--Cmaven555 (talk) 03:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nick Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hi-5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Continued addition of hoaxes and errors into articles

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Jr, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bonusballs (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 23:46, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaylor2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Disruptive editing Kaylor2012 (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 01:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaylor2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please do not disrupt ever again!!

Decline reason:

Is that a request for the rest of us, or an indication that you won't disrupt Wikipedia again? As indicated in the previous unblock request, you'll have to be more specific about your actions, how they violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and how you intend to avoid repeating those mistakes again. Kinu ^t/_c 03:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Stephanie.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stephanie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 04:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tweenies jake.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tweenies jake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaylor2012, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Grewia (talk) 18:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]