User talk:Katpawley

Welcome

G'day Katpawley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Article titles

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 08:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added - as the teahouse invitation on this page suggests you hadnt an Australian welcome - so here it is! JarrahTree 08:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Katpawley, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Katpawley! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Australian Biota project is always interested in having editors realise that there is a central point of contact with other editors through the biota project, and would be very keen to communicate and interact over materials you are editing. Please let us know if there is anything we can help you with, or in any way offer suggestions; or for that matter, anything you might wish to offer as suggestions to the project JarrahTree 02:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikipeople

appreciate your interest, but can you PLEASE let me actually do some work on the draft before you pounce on it and start editing?

If you look at the 2 other pages I have created Pseudoraphis spinescens and Juncus ingens, you will see I know how to reference properly.

I also have no intention of leaving all the copy/paste text the way it is, or leaving the table broken up the way it is, it's just like that for ease of working on it until its done.

I repeat, DRAFT, I have been working on it less than a day!

Thanks katpawley (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

some editors will not take the advice, the fact it is, it is on wiki will make some people itchy fingered (draft is a red flag to some) - better to take it off completely until ready.

Also the sheer size will raise the ire of many editors, it is not what wikipedia is WP:ABOUT to have lists that large or complicated - much better to speak with editors on or off wiki about possible resolution to the size issue. cheers JarrahTree 04:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've moved the page to a new user sandbox, I was under the impression that user sandboxes were automatically emptied regularly, same as in the Wikipedia tutorial, and haven't been saving anything in mine. I think that is what I should have been doing, rather than creating draft pages. I also really do appreciate the efforts people make to uphold standards and improve Wikipedia, and am actually quite reassured to find out that unreferenced work that doesn't meet taxonomic standards won't last long on Wikipedia! Keep up the good work, katpawley (talk) 11:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you have friendly experienced users who are sympathetic and understanding to your efforts who have your sandbox on watch, it should go nowhere... JarrahTree 13:07, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]