User talk:Katicab2

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Torrie Wilson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Hybrid T/C 04:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lisa Marie Varon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Hybrid T/C 04:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Jonas Brothers. Thank you. NrDg 19:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not add events that have not yet happened to articles. It is not confirmed that Jeff Hardy will be making his return on June 20th at a house show. We can only report on events that have happened. Thanks. :) Hazardous Matt 19:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Miley Cyrus. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. NrDg 19:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miley Cyrus. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 00:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Miley Cyrus. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also private so isn't useful even if it were real NrDg 00:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Miley Cyrus, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. NrDg 15:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

You have been blocked from editing for 55 hours. You have been advised that the link you provided was inappropriate, yet started edit warring for its inclusion some nine hours after being warned. Should you continue vandalising Wikipedia when this block expires you will likely be blocked for considerably longer. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Katicab2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is her real personal myspace

Decline reason:

No, this is Wikipedia, which is very specifically not Myspace. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But i mean the myspace i put.