User talk:Kathywimmer

g'day!

Welcome!

Hello Kathywimmer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 17:41, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Couture summary

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Camp Couture, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Fritz S. (Talk) 21:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhking (talk • contribs) 00:58, 23 January 2006

Your change to the page Harry and his bucket full of dinosaurs was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. 199.111.230.195 06:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of mewtwowimmer.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Kathywimmer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

216.165.245.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusive sockpuppetry at this address by Mewtwowimmer

Blocking administrator: Netsnipe (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Sorry, the coincidence in the last name, IP address, and the fact that after nine months of inactivity, you suddenly wish to edit articles again is just a bit too much for me to lift this autoblock. — Yamla 00:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a mere coincidence we share the same last name. I've never heard of Mewtwowimmer.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Kathywimmer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

216.165.245.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusive sockpuppetry at this address by Mewtwowimmer

Blocking administrator: Netsnipe (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Per the above block message. And the similarities of your names and your contribution history raises too big and blaring of a "I'm a sock" flag. — ²¹⁰physicq (c) 01:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because we have the same last name doesn't mean we're related.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Kathywimmer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

216.165.245.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusive sockpuppetry at this address by User:Mewtwowimmer

Blocking administrator: Netsnipe (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Per above. — Sandstein 04:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kathywimmer 23:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC) I'm back for good this time! And I'm ready to make entertainment-related edits![reply]

Image tagging for Image:17600.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:17600.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Television station articles

Please stop vandalising television station articles with trivial additions of cartoons. This is not helpful, and should not be tolerated. Rollosmokes 01:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm admitting it

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kathywimmer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Neither me, Misteroonova, Melvinsneedly nor Pixiefrogmelvin is related to Mewtwowimmer in any way.

Decline reason:

See below. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kathywimmer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a sock! Mewtwowimmer's block expired 6 months ago and he has had it with motherfucking Metros!

Decline reason:

Appears to be a sockpuppet. Will gladly share my reasoning via email, if anyone's curious. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.