Jump to content

User talk:Katerina Kosta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


AfC notification: User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Katerina Kosta, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wia🎄/tlk 15:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 02:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Omni Flames was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Omni Flames let's talk about it 23:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with editing the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gurnick_Academy_of_Medical_Arts There are a lot of other similar Wiki pages about similar school or colleges... and they were approved and published here in Wikipedia. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanbridge_College https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Merritt_University https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heald_College https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrington_College_(US) and so on

Please tell me what should I add to the text to be approved?

Katerina Kosta (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That article is rather devoid of encyclopedic content. Much of the content it has is unreferenced. It devotes more space to charitable efforts than to education or research, which would generally be expected to be the primary focus of a university. Coverage of the university itself is fleeting at best. Still dthe draft does not adequately summarize what the reliable sources (as opposed to the school's press releases) do report about the university. For example, after reading the sources I know that it costs $48,800 to get an education that qualifies for an entry-level hospital job - the article does not mention any of that, which would seem relevant to a for-profit institution. Huon (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with my article about Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts: what else can I do to become referenced enough because Gurnick Academy has both accrediting bodies, news articles, and other sources that prove its eligibility. Thank you in advance

Katerina Kosta (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have next to no prose, just a course list and something on how charitable the students are. It seems the academy is more renowned for that charity than for, say, providing an education. For example, how does it do in USA Today rankings of educational institutions? The provided coverage in reliable third-party sources amounts to some local news pieces that don't give many additional details about the academy. If this is the best that can be found, I rather don't think the organization meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. Huon (talk) 18:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw that I gave basically the same advice above and was ignored. I really wonder why you repeat the question when you ignore the answers you get. Huon (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wyskoj was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
wyskojtalk 17:14, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Katerina Kosta. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm talk 16:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]