User talk:Katerina Kosta

AfC notification: User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The lede sentence should state that the campuses of the school are in California.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Katerina Kosta, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Katerina Kosta/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia🎄/tlk 15:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 02:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Omni Flames was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with editing the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gurnick_Academy_of_Medical_Arts There are a lot of other similar Wiki pages about similar school or colleges... and they were approved and published here in Wikipedia. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanbridge_College https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Merritt_University https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heald_College https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrington_College_(US) and so on

Please tell me what should I add to the text to be approved?

Katerina Kosta (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That article is rather devoid of encyclopedic content. Much of the content it has is unreferenced. It devotes more space to charitable efforts than to education or research, which would generally be expected to be the primary focus of a university. Coverage of the university itself is fleeting at best. Still dthe draft does not adequately summarize what the reliable sources (as opposed to the school's press releases) do report about the university. For example, after reading the sources I know that it costs $48,800 to get an education that qualifies for an entry-level hospital job - the article does not mention any of that, which would seem relevant to a for-profit institution. Huon (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with my article about Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts: what else can I do to become referenced enough because Gurnick Academy has both accrediting bodies, news articles, and other sources that prove its eligibility. Thank you in advance

Katerina Kosta (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have next to no prose, just a course list and something on how charitable the students are. It seems the academy is more renowned for that charity than for, say, providing an education. For example, how does it do in USA Today rankings of educational institutions? The provided coverage in reliable third-party sources amounts to some local news pieces that don't give many additional details about the academy. If this is the best that can be found, I rather don't think the organization meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. Huon (talk) 18:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that I gave basically the same advice above and was ignored. I really wonder why you repeat the question when you ignore the answers you get. Huon (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wyskoj was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your submission has information like specific programs that should not be included. Wikipedia:NOTADVERTISING

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wyskoj^talk 17:14, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts

Hello, Katerina Kosta. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm ^talk 16:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]