User talk:Katerichards14
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/African_Politics_(Spring_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Katerichards14, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]Unspecified source/license for File:ZambianNationalWomensLobby.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:ZambianNationalWomensLobby.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:46, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Amanda Ostrom's Peer Review
[edit]The Lead is comprehensive and thorough. The introductory sentence gives a clear and concise description of the organization. The sentence "At the time..." would make more sense if moved after the sentence "The Lobby was created following Zambia's transition from a one-party state to a multi-party democracy in 1990."
The content is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. The Formation section could be expanded to include more information about the Young Women's Christian Association Centre Meeting, if possible. Within the Impact section, the last sentence on the organization's international presence could be elaborated on.
The tone of the article is neutral, and the article provides a factual and unbiased description of the organization.
The sources appear to be reliable and thorough. There is a good balance of academic and government sources.
The content is well-written and easy to read. The current section breakdown of the article makes sense. However, it might be helpful to add a section explaining some of the organization's typical activities in detail or examples of specific work the organization has done.
Overall, the article gives a clear and unbiased description of the organization. Great job so far!