User talk:Katekrejci
The lawsuits Generac took out against Caterpillar and lost in both the lower court and 7th District Court of Appeals are well-documented. You may refer to the Generac Corp. v. Caterpillar Inc., 172 F.3d 971, 978 (7th Cir. 1999).
This is material information - especially with Generac now being traded as a public company. Please refrain from removing this information from Wikipedia.
This information is included in the new paragraph; the wording is different.
Generac Power Systems
[edit]If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Generac Power Systems, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article Generac Power Systems. Wikipedia is not the "Yellow Pages". If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets, such as Wikia's Yellowikis. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Generac Power Systems. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Generac Power Systems, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 64.252.144.152 (talk) 23:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I used to work for Generac and was involved in some of the detail work in the 1990's; perhaps we worked together at that time. Now that they are a publicly-traded company I think it's important potential investors know the real details about the Caterpillar relationship (generator supply ceased in 1998) and the very significant write-off CCMP has had to take. I will continue to insert these details to the Generac page because I believe these material facts are important.Gregsedits (talk) 23:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)User:gregsedits
Generac Power Systems again
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Generac Power Systems. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.252.144.152 (talk) 02:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Generac XG 8000E.JPG
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Generac XG 8000E.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim1357 talk 02:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
File:XG Portable Generator.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:XG Portable Generator.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.