User talk:Katcheic

Welcome!

Hello, Katcheic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dloh cierekim 02:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Giorgos Fountoulis

Hello, Katcheic,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Giorgos Fountoulis should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgos Fountoulis .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Tco03displays (talk) 02:45, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Manolis Kapelonis

Hello, Katcheic,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Manolis Kapelonis should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manolis Kapelonis .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Tco03displays (talk) 02:45, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Giorgos Fountoulis

Hello, Katcheic,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Giorgos Fountoulis should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgos Fountoulis .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Tco03displays (talk) 02:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the two articles I marked for deletion

It is more appropriate to write an article concerning the murder of these two individuals, instead of writing two semi-biographical pages for them. If you can combine the two articles into one article, say, Murders of Manolis Kapelonis and Giorgos Fountoulis, that would be much more useful. --Tco03displays (talk) 02:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Sorry about that AfD. I really hope that you don't get discouraged by that, and that you can continue to edit Wikipedia. Epicgenius (talk) 03:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tco03displays. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Edit warring on Manolis Kapelonis

Please note your edit history on Manolis Kapelonis looks like you are involved in an edit war. Wikipedia also has a bright line three revert rule which it appears you have broken on the page. I encourage you to try and reach a consensus by discussing the issues on the article's talk page or in the article's deletion discussion. Continuing to edit Manolis Kapelonis may result in a block to prevent disruption. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Katcheic, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Katcheic!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.

December 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Murder of Manolis Fountoulis and Giorgos Kapelonis to Golden Down office, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tco03displays (talk) 04:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Katcheic reported by User:Tco03displays (Result: ). Thank you. Tco03displays (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of Manolis Fountoulis and Giorgos Kapelonis to Golden Down office, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tco03displays (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Murder of Manolis Fountoulis and Giorgos Kapelonis to Golden Down office. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Μανώλης Καπελώνης

Hello, Katcheic. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Μανώλης Καπελώνης, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tco03displays (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Γιώργος Φουντούλης

Hello, Katcheic. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Γιώργος Φουντούλης, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tco03displays (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respond to article talkpage

Talk:Attack_at_Golden_Dawn_Office_on_1_November,_2013#Constant_Edit_Wars:_Please_Discuss_the_Content_of_the_Page_to_reach_Consensus --Tco03displays (talk) 20:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit and page move warring

Katcheic, you seem to have an inability to understand that discussion is required especially on pages which have been the subject of edit and move warring. You made no effort during the page protection to discuss the article and instead returned to the article straight after the protection expired to move the page and add a non-free poster. You need to go to the talk page and discuss the situation. You also seem to be advocating a particular point of view and seem to have difficulty remaining neutral. If you continue to make edits or page moves without discussion you may be blocked for an extended period of time. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Manolis Kapelonis and Giorgos Fountoylis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Manolis Kapelonis and Giorgos Fountoylis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for edit warring, again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring at Murder attack on members of the Golden Dawn Office. After the warning I gave you just up there, you reverted another editor removing the poster you added. There is only one revert in WP:Bold, revert, discuss and that revert was this one. From there as I told you too above you needed to discuss the addition of the poster, not revert again. You need to understand this, because you are disrupting Wikipedia. abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Murder attack on members of the Golden Dawn Office, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Tco03displays (talk) 10:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roller chain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser request

Katcheic, I have removed your Quick CheckUser request from WP:SPI. It appears that you are in a dispute/edit war with those two editors, and them disagreeing with you is in no way evidence of sockpuppetry. In any case, the Quick CheckUser request section of the page is not to be used for sockpuppetry complaints. If you have reasonable evidence of sockpuppetry, you are welcome to file a case as instructed at the top of the SPI page. —DoRD (talk) 23:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dolescum (talk) 15:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]